An expression for the vertical velocity as a function of time

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the vertical velocity of a rocket as a function of time, considering its changing mass due to fuel consumption. The rocket's acceleration is defined as a = T/(m0 - m't) - g, where T is the constant buoyancy and g is the gravitational acceleration. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the relationship between acceleration and velocity, suggesting that acceleration is the time derivative of velocity. There is a debate on whether to use definite or indefinite integrals for the calculations, with encouragement to try both methods. The overall focus is on guiding individuals to engage actively in solving the physics problem themselves.
Physil
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
New user has been reminded to show their work on schoolwork questions
A rocket of initial mass m0 is launched vertically upwards from the rest. The rocket burns fuel at the constant rate m', in such a way, that, after t seconds, the mass of the rocket is m0-m't. With a constant buoyancy T, the acceleration becomes equal to a=T/(m0-m't) -g. The atmospheric resistance can be neglected, and the gravitational accelereation ,g, is considered a constant for low-level flights. Deduce an expression for the vertical velocity v of the rocket, as a function of time t, before the fuel burns out completely.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are your ideas about the problem?
 
We're not here to solve physics problems for you. We're here to help YOU solve them. You have to make an effort towards a solution. If you need a hint to get started, acceleration is the time derivative of velocity.
 
Mister T said:
We're not here to solve physics problems for you. We're here to help YOU solve them. You have to make an effort towards a solution. If you need a hint to get started, acceleration is the time derivative of velocity.
I'm sorry. I new here. That's exactly what I was thinking. I just don't know if I should use definite or indefinite integral.
 
Physil said:
I'm sorry. I new here. That's exactly what I was thinking. I just don't know if I should use definite or indefinite integral.
Why would you use an indefinite integral? Does the integration have a starting point and stopping point?
 
Physil said:
I just don't know if I should use definite or indefinite integral.
Try it both ways and see. It doesn't take that much time.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top