An Interesting Gravitation Problem

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 5K views
k1point618
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two satellites are launched at a distance R from a planet of negligible radius. (Yes, that's what the problem says...) Both satellites are launched in the tangential direction. the first satellite launches correctly at a speed [tex]v_0[/tex] and enters a circular orbit. The second satellite, however, is launched at a speed [tex]\frac{1}{2}v_0[/tex] . What is the minimum distance between the second satellite and the planet over the course of its orbit?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I thought about using energy. The two satellites both start out with the same potential energy but different kinetic energy.

So satellite one's TME: [tex]-\frac{GMm}{R} + \frac{1}{2}mv_0^2[/tex]

where as satellite two's TME:[tex]-\frac{GMm}{R} + \frac{1}{8}mv_0^2[/tex]

And the second satellite's minimum distance is when its potential is the least...
Somehow I think this problem might relate to angular momentum... L = mvr, but not exactly sure.

THANK YOU =D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use the fact the first satellite goes into a circular orbit to figure out M in terms of R and v0 using the centripetal acceleration of an object in circular motion. Let R1 and v1 be the radius at the lowest point. At the lowest point v1 is again tangenential to the planet. So conservation of angular momentum gives you one equation in R1 and v1 and conservation of energy gives you another. Solve them simultaneously.
 
Ah, i c~

and i got it right =D

ThanX
 
Dick said:
You can use the fact the first satellite goes into a circular orbit to figure out M in terms of R and v0 using the centripetal acceleration of an object in circular motion. Let R1 and v1 be the radius at the lowest point. At the lowest point v1 is again tangenential to the planet. So conservation of angular momentum gives you one equation in R1 and v1 and conservation of energy gives you another. Solve them simultaneously.

How can you prove that the lowest point does indeed occur when the velocity is tangent again? And why do we need to know that it is tangent? Is something not conserved otherwise?
 
Last edited:
compwiz3000 said:
How can you prove that the lowest point does indeed occur when the velocity is tangent again? And why do we need to know that it is tangent? Is something not conserved otherwise?

The lowest point occurs when the object is traveling 'horizontally' i.e. perpendicular to the radial vector connecting the object to the planets center. Draw a picture. Knowing the angle between those vectors makes it easy to compute angular momentum. Try it.
 
haha I forgot that angular momentum is a cross product