Analysis: Closed sets and extrema

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around properties of closed sets in the context of real numbers, specifically focusing on the existence of suprema, maxima, and minima within these sets. The original poster presents two parts: proving that the supremum of a closed set is contained within the set and demonstrating that a closed and bounded set has both a maximum and minimum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the original poster's attempts to prove the statements, with some questioning the validity of the approach taken for part b). There are suggestions to reconsider the definitions of closed sets and the implications of having upper and lower bounds. The original poster is encouraged to explore sequences converging to the supremum.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's reasoning, providing feedback on the proposed proofs and suggesting alternative lines of thought. There is a recognition of the need for further exploration of the concepts involved, particularly in establishing the existence of sequences that converge to the supremum.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight potential flaws in the original poster's reasoning, particularly regarding the characterization of closed sets as finite unions of closed intervals. There is an emphasis on the definitions of closed sets and the implications of these definitions for the problems at hand.

iopmar06
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a) Let U be a closed subset of the reals with an upper bound. You know that U has a supremum, say z. Prove that z is an element of U.

b) Suppose U is a closed subset of the real numbers with an upper and lower bound. Prove that U has a maximum and minimum.

The Attempt at a Solution



I was able to come up with a proof for b) by simply finding the maximum and minimum of U however I feel like the proof is flawed.

b) Since U is a closed and bounded subset of R, we can write U as a finite collection of closed intervals of R.

U = \cup^{n}_{1} I_{i} where I_{i} = [a_{i},b_{i}].

Hence for each I_{i},

max(I_{i}) = b_{i}

and

min(I_{i}) = a_{i}.

Then consider the set

S = (a_{i})\cup(b_{i}) for i = 1,...,n.

Then max(s) = b_{max} and min(S) = a_{min}.

So max(U) and min(U) both exist and are equal to bmax and amax respectively.

a) I wasn't sure how to do this one. I tried using some inequalities and defining the maximum of U but couldn't come up with anything useful.

Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
b) is deeply flawed. You CANNOT write every closed and bounded subset of R as a finite union of closed intervals, take e.g. {1/n for n in N} union {0}. Go back to the first one. You have a supremum z. Suppose z is NOT in U. Can you show every neighborhood of z contains an element of U? Can you use that to construct a sequence in U converging to z? Can you see where to go from here?
 
Or: for (a), since U is closed, its complement is open. If is in complement of U, it is an interior point, there exist some \delta so that the \delta neighborhood of z is in U, ...

(b) If a set of real numbers has an upper bound, then it has a sup. What does (a) tell you about that sup? If a set of real numbers has a lower bound, then it has an inf. You should be able to prove a theorem similar to (a) for infimums.
 
Thanks for your replies. I can see where I should be going with a) but I'm still working on it.

a) Consider the metric space (R,d) where d is the euclidean metric d(x,y)=|x-y|. Note that if (X,d) is a metric space then a subset Y of X is called closed if for every sequence (y(n)) of elements of Y, if (y(n)) has a limit L in X, then L is in Y. U is a closed and bounded above subset of R with supremum z. Then if there is a sequence (u(n)) of elements of U that converges to z, then z is in U.

Now all I need to do is find such a sequence, any ideas?

For now assume a) is true.

b) Let U be a closed and bounded subset of R. Since U is bounded there are real numbers
x=inf(U) and y=sup(U). It follows from a) that y is in U and via a similar proof that x is also in U. Since x,y are inf,sup respectively, x<=u<=y for all u in U. Thus min(U)=x and max(U) = y.
 
Last edited:
That's not the proof I would give because I prefer to use the equivalent definition of "closed": A set is closed if and only if its complement is open. However, it certainly can be used:
If \alpha is an upper bound for X, then there exist a member, x, of X such that d(x,\alpha)&lt; 1/n for every integer n. Let {xn} be a member of x in d(x,\alpha)&lt; 1/n.

And if you talk about a "similar" proof, you had better be ready to give that "similar" proof explicitely.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K