Analysis: continuous function and open sets

Click For Summary
In a metric space (X, p), the function h defined as h(x) = d(x, A)/[d(x, A) + d(x, B)] is continuous and maps X to [0,1], where h(x) equals 0 if x is in closed set A and 1 if x is in closed set B. The discussion focuses on proving the existence of disjoint open sets U and V such that A is a subset of U and B is a subset of V. The sets h^{-1}([0,1/2[) and h^{-1}(]1/2,1]) are identified as the required open sets, leveraging the continuity of h. Clarifications are made regarding the openness of these sets in the context of the codomain [0,1]. The participants express confidence in understanding the proof after addressing initial confusion.
malicx
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let (X, p) be a metric space, and let A and B be nonempty, closed, disjoint subsets of X.
define d(x,A) = inf{p(x, a)|a in A}

h(x) = d(x, A)/[d(x, A) + d(x, B)]
defines a continuous function h: X -> [0,1]. h(x) = 0 iff x is in A, and h(x) = 1 iff x is in B. Infer that there exist open sets U and V of X such that A \subset U and B \subsetV with U \cap V = \emptyset

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I have showed everything except the last part about disjoint open sets. I don't think I can just say that since A and B are disjoint, there is an r>0 such that B_r(A) \cap B_r(B) = \emptyset. I'm actually having a hard time seeing how the iff statements are necessary. Any hints would be helpful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For your general culture: the function h is called a Urysohn function.

Now for the proof. Consider h^{-1}([0,1/2[) and h^{-1}(]1/2,1]). These are the sets you're looking for...
 
micromass said:
For your general culture: the function h is called a Urysohn function.

Now for the proof. Consider h^{-1}([0,1/2[) and h^{-1}(]1/2,1]). These are the sets you're looking for...

I'm not sure I understand... we know that, given an open set in [0, 1], its inverse image is open in X by continuity. But [0, 1/2) and (1/2, 1] are neither open nor closed. If we say (0, 1/2) and (1/2, 1) then we are saying that h(x) =/= 0, so x is not in A, but we are looking for A \subset U for some U, right?
 
Remember that your codomain is [0,1]. The sets [0,1/2[ and ]1/2,1] are open in [0,1] (they are not open in R of course, but they are in [0,1].

If you don't like that, then you can always consider the sets ]-1,1/2[ and ]1/2,2[ and take R as codomain of h...
 
micromass said:
Remember that your codomain is [0,1]. The sets [0,1/2[ and ]1/2,1] are open in [0,1] (they are not open in R of course, but they are in [0,1].

If you don't like that, then you can always consider the sets ]-1,1/2[ and ]1/2,2[ and take R as codomain of h...

Of course it is! >_<. I am really bad at topology...

Thank you for your help, I'm confident I understand it now (and it is so obvious!)
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K