Analysis of Person Diving into Pool w/ Uniform Horizontal Beam

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves analyzing the forces and torques acting on a diving board as a person prepares to dive into a pool. The board is a uniform horizontal beam with specific dimensions and weights, and the goal is to determine the reactions at the supports.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply equilibrium equations but questions their results, indicating a misunderstanding of force distribution and torque calculations.
  • Some participants suggest not making assumptions about weight distribution and emphasize the importance of labeling forces and using torque conditions for equilibrium.
  • Others inquire about the choice of pivot points in torque equations and the proper application of distances for forces.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying the setup of the problem and the application of physics principles. Some guidance has been provided regarding the labeling of forces and the use of torque conditions, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

The original poster's calculations appear to be significantly off from expected answers, prompting questions about assumptions and methods used in their analysis. There is an emphasis on ensuring that all forces and torques are accounted for correctly.

ana111790
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An 80kg person is preparing to dive into a pool. The diving board is a uniform horizontal beam that is hinged to the ground at point A and supported by a frictionless roller at D. B is the point directly under the center of gravity of the person. The distance between A to B is l=6m, and the distance between A to D is d=2m. Note the 1/3 of the board is located between A and B and 2/3 between D and B. You can assume that the board consists of two parts with two different weights connected at D.

If the diving board has a total weight of 1500 N determine the reactions on the beam at A and D.

Picture:
[PLAIN]http://img837.imageshack.us/img837/3036/drawinge.jpg

Homework Equations


[tex]\sum Fy[/tex]=0
[tex]\sum Fx[/tex]=0
[tex]\sum M[/tex]=0

The Attempt at a Solution


I think the only equation that can be used here is [tex]\sum Fy[/tex]=0.

Forces that act at point A is only 1/2 of 1/3 of the total weight of the board, (I multiplied by 1/2 since that 1/3 of the weight is shared by points A and D)

So for [tex]\sum[/tex]= 1/2 * 1/3 * -Wboard + Ron A = 0
To solve for Ron A = 250 N (up)
This is however a wrong answer. The RA should be 2318 N (down) according to the answer in the book.

Forces that act at point D are 1/2 of the 1/3 of the Weight of the board, 2/3 of the weight of the board and the weight of the person.
So for [tex]\sum[/tex]= (1/2 * 1/3 * Wboard) + (2/3 Wboard) + ( Wperson) + Ron D = 0
To solve for Ron D = - (-250 N - 1000 N - 784 N) = 2034 (up).
This answer is also wrong, correct answer should be 4602 N (up)I am obviously missing something major here since the answers are so off. What am I doing?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't make any assumptions about how the weight of the board will be divided up between the supports.
(1) The weight of an object--such as the board--can be considered to act through its center of mass.
(2) Label all the forces acting on the board.
(3) Use the torque condition for equilibrium.
 
Doc Al said:
Don't make any assumptions about how the weight of the board will be divided up between the supports.
(1) The weight of an object--such as the board--can be considered to act through its center of mass.
(2) Label all the forces acting on the board.
(3) Use the torque condition for equilibrium.



[PLAIN]http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/9051/drawing2n.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Your analysis of the weights is good. Your diagram needs to show the upward force on the board at D and the downward force at A. Call those forces FD and FA (or whatever you like--just give them names).

I don't understand your torque equations. What are you using as your pivot in each case?

(M stands for 'moment'--another term for torque--not momentum!)
 
Doc Al said:
Your analysis of the weights is good. Your diagram needs to show the upward force on the board at D and the downward force at A. Call those forces FD and FA (or whatever you like--just give them names).

I don't understand your torque equations. What are you using as your pivot in each case?

(M stands for 'moment'--another term for torque--not momentum!)

(I meant to write moment not momentum, sorry for the confusion)


[PLAIN]http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/8467/drawing2t.jpg

For the first equation (Sum of torque on A) I am using point A as a pivot (so the whole weight of the board is the force and the radius is the whole length of the board, same for weight of person)
For the second equation (Sum of torque on D) I am using point D as a pivot, so 1/3 weight of board with radius 2 m (cw) and then 2/3 of the weight of the board with radius 4, and weight of person with radius 4m (ccw).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ana111790 said:
For the first equation (Sum of torque on A) I am using point A as a pivot (so the whole weight of the board is the force and the radius is the whole length of the board, same for weight of person)
Your diagram shows 5 forces. If you want to treat the weight of the board as a single force, that's fine--where would that force act?

Going by your diagram, that equation will show the torques about A for all 5 forces. (Some of the torques will be trivial, of course.)

For the second equation (Sum of torque on D) I am using point D as a pivot, so 1/3 weight of board with radius 2 m (cw) and then 2/3 of the weight of the board with radius 4, and weight of person with radius 4m (ccw).
Here I expect to see the torques about D for all forces. Careful that you use the proper distance from the pivot for each force. The W1 and W2 forces are in the middle of their sections.
 
Solved it! Thank you so much for your help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K