Analysis problem: x>o -> 1/x > 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter b0it0i
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the mathematical statement that if \( x > 0 \), then \( \frac{1}{x} > 0 \). Participants utilize ordered field axioms and properties such as closure, identity, and the existence of inverses to derive a contradiction when assuming \( \frac{1}{x} \leq 0 \). The proof hinges on the unique existence of \( \frac{1}{x} \) and the implications of multiplying inequalities, ultimately demonstrating that the assumption leads to the false statement \( 0 > 1 \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ordered field axioms
  • Familiarity with properties of inequalities
  • Knowledge of multiplicative inverses in mathematics
  • Basic proof techniques in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the closure property in ordered fields
  • Learn about the properties of inequalities and their applications in proofs
  • Explore the concept of multiplicative inverses and their uniqueness
  • Review techniques for deriving contradictions in mathematical proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in formal proofs and analysis within the context of ordered fields and inequalities.

b0it0i
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Analysis problem: x>o --> 1/x > 0

Homework Statement


Prove

If x>0 --> 1/x > 0


Homework Equations



ordered field axioms

closure, associativity, commutativity, identity, inverses, distributive law, trichotomy law, transitive law, preservation

x+z = y+z --> x = y
x.0 = 0
-1.x = -x
xy=0 iff x=0 or y=0
x<y iff -y<-x
x<y and z<0 then xz > yz


The Attempt at a Solution



i've tried this problem several times, and always hit a dead end

i tried a direct proof

assume x>0
therefore x does not equal 0

by existence of inverse

there exists a unique 1/x such that x (1/x) = 1

after that point, i get no where in my attempts

any suggestions?

you can user other "theorems" but you must also prove them
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assume 1/x<0. Can you derive a contradiction using one of the properties you listed? (Hint: which one deals with things <0?)
 
hey thanks a lot

prove: x > 0 --> 1/x > 0

assume 0 < x and assume 1/x less than or equal to 0, x cannot equal 0. then there exists a unique 1/x s.t. x(1/x) = 1. since 1/x is unique, 1/x cannot equal zero.
therefore 1/x < 0

since 0 < x and 1/x < 0

0. 1/x > x . 1/x
0 > 1

which contradicts 0 < 1

i would have to prove that 1 > 0, but i already done this.

thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K