Analysis- upper and lower integrals

  • Thread starter Thread starter kristinv88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Integrals
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of upper and lower integrals of a bounded function defined on a closed interval, specifically focusing on the implications of the function being zero at all rational points within that interval.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definitions of upper and lower integrals and their relationship to rational and irrational numbers. Questions arise regarding the implications of the function's behavior at rational points and how this affects the integrals.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into considering rational and irrational numbers simultaneously within the context of partitions. There is recognition of the need to analyze the minimum and maximum values of the function over closed intervals, although some participants express uncertainty about the implications of these values.

Contextual Notes

The original poster's inquiry is constrained by the requirement to prove a relationship between the lower and upper integrals based on the function's behavior at rational points, while also needing to consider the behavior at irrational points.

kristinv88
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Suppose that the bounded function f:[a,b]-->R has the property that for each rational number x in the interval [a,b], f(x)=o for all x in [a,b]. Prove that
the lower integral of f from a to b is less than or equal to zero which is less than or equal to the upper integral of f from a to b.

Here's what I have so far (idk if it's right though!):

Define the upper integral=sup{L(f,P) s.t. P is a partition of the interval [a,b]}.
Define the lower integral=inf{U(f,P) s.t. P is a partition of the interval [a,b]}.

Case 1: x is rational
upper integral=sup{0}=0
lower integral=inf{0}=0
so our answer for this case is trivial

Case 2: x is irrational
this is where I'm stuck!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your integrals are Riemann integrals, right? (Should be from your definition). So you must consider rational and irrational values of x _at once_, there is no point in seeing them separately. Therefore, for each closed interval I in your partition P, can the minimum of { f(x): x from I } be larger than zero? Can the maximum be smaller than zero? That's all you need.
 
They are Riemann integrals. I see what you mean about not splitting it up into two cases. But I don't see why the minimum can't be larger than zero or why the maximum couldn't be less than zero :confused:
 
Each (closed) interval I contains rational and irrational numbers, right? So for each I, there are two possibilities: the minimum is at a rational number, or at an irrational one. If it is at a rational number, it is zero. If it is at an irrational one, will it be positive or negative?
 
i understand it now! thank you soo much for your help :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K