MHB Analytic Geometry: Lines Problem

AI Thread Summary
In triangle ABC with vertices A(-2,7) and C(7,-5), the altitude from AC is 5 units, and the altitude from BC is √45. The slope of line AC is calculated as -4/3, leading to the equation of line AC. The coordinates of point B, which lies below line AC, can be determined using the area of the triangle and the relationship between the lengths of the sides and altitudes. Two possible coordinates for point B are found: B1(-3,0) and B2(9,-16), with B1 being the valid solution as it meets the condition of being below line AC.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
In a triangle ABC: A(-2,7) and C(7,-5).

The length of the altitude of AC is 5, and the length of the altitude of BC is the square root of 45. I wish to find the vertex B, given that it is below the line AC.

I need your help, I have no idea how to approach this.

Thank you in advance.

I have started by calculating that AC is -(4/3)x+(13/3)

that's more or less all I have done.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think I would first use the information that the altitude from $\overline{AC}$ is 5 to determine a line that must contain $B$. We find the slope of $\overline{AC}$ is:

$$\frac{7+5}{-2-7}=-\frac{4}{3}$$

This line must contain a point $\left(x_1,y_1\right)$ whose slope with $A$ is $$\frac{3}{4}$$ and whose distance from $A$ is 5. So, we may write:

$$\frac{7-y_1}{-2-x_1}=\frac{3}{4}\implies 7-y_1=-\frac{3}{4}\left(2+x_1\right)$$

$$\left(2+x_1\right)^2+\left(7-y_1\right)^2=25$$

$$\left(2+x_1\right)^2+\frac{9}{16}\left(2+x_1\right)^2=25$$

$$\frac{25}{16}\left(2+x_1\right)^2=25$$

$$\left(2+x_1\right)^2=16$$

$$2+x_1=\pm4$$

$$x_1=-2\pm4$$

Since $B$ is said to lie below $\overline{AC}$, we take the solution:

$$x_1=-6\implies y_1=4$$

And so now armed with the slope and a point on the line which must contain $B$, using the point-slope formula, we find this line to be:

$$y=-\frac{4}{3}(x+6)+4=-\frac{4}{3}x-4=-\frac{4}{3}(x+3)$$

And so we may now label the coordinates of point $B$ as:

$$\left(x_B,-\frac{4}{3}\left(x_B+3\right)\right)$$

To continue, you need to find the $x_B$, such that the perpendicular distance from $A$ to the line through $B$ and $C$ is $\sqrt{45}$. (Thinking)
 
Thank you for the assistance.

There is something wrong, or that I do not understand in your solution.

View attachment 6513

I agree that the slope of BG is 3/4 like you said. But why is the distance between G and A is 5 ? The distance between B and G is 5. I am slightly confused. The line AC is y=(-4/3)+(13/3). G is on this line and the distance from G to B is 5.
 

Attachments

  • plot.JPG
    plot.JPG
    10.7 KB · Views: 105
What I am saying is that $B$ must lie on the red line:

\begin{tikzpicture}[xscale=0.5,yscale=0.5]
\usetikzlibrary{shapes,positioning,intersections,quotes}
\def\x{3};
\draw[<->] (-10.3,0) -- (10.3,0) node
{$x$};
\draw[<->] (0,-10.3) -- (0,10.3) node[above] {$y$};
\draw[domain=4.4:-10.1, variable=\x, red, ultra thick] plot ({\x}, {-(4/3)*(\x+3)}) node[above] {$y=-\dfrac{4}{3}(x+3)$};
\node[circle,draw=blue, fill=blue, inner sep=0pt,minimum size=5pt] (b) at (-2,7) {};
\node[above=1pt of {(-2,7)}, blue, outer sep=2pt,fill=none] {$A(-2,7)$};
\node[circle,draw=blue, fill=blue, inner sep=0pt,minimum size=5pt] (b) at (7,-5) {};
\node[below=1pt of {(7,-5)}, blue, outer sep=2pt,fill=none] {$C(7,-5)$};
\end{tikzpicture}​
 
Perhaps a simpler way to determine the coordinates of point $B$ is to observe the that area $A$ of the triangle must be:

$$A=\frac{1}{2}bh=\frac{1}{2}\overline{AC}\cdot5=\frac{5}{2}\sqrt{9^2+12^2}=\frac{75}{2}$$

We may also write:

$$A=\frac{1}{2}bh=\frac{1}{2}\overline{BC}\cdot\sqrt{45}=\frac{\sqrt{45}}{2}\sqrt{\left(7-x_B\right)^2+\left(\frac{4}{3}\left(x_B+3\right)-5\right)^2}$$

This implies:

$$\left(7-x_B\right)^2+\left(\frac{4}{3}\left(x_B+3\right)-5\right)^2=125$$

Solving this, we get:

$$x_B\in\{-3,9\}$$

And so this gives us two possible locations for point $B$:

$$B_1(-3,0)$$

$$B_2(9,-16)$$

\begin{tikzpicture}[xscale=0.375,yscale=0.375]
\usetikzlibrary{shapes,positioning,intersections,quotes}
\def\x{3};
\draw[<->] (-20.3,0) -- (20.3,0) node
{$x$};
\draw[<->] (0,-20.3) -- (0,20.3) node[above] {$y$};
\node[circle,draw=blue, fill=blue, inner sep=0pt,minimum size=5pt] (b) at (-2,7) {};
\node[left=1pt of {(-2,7)}, blue, outer sep=2pt,fill=none] {$A(-2,7)$};
\node[circle,draw=blue, fill=blue, inner sep=0pt,minimum size=5pt] (b) at (7,-5) {};
\node[right=1pt of {(7,-5)}, blue, outer sep=2pt,fill=none] {$C(7,-5)$};
\node[circle,draw=black!30!green, fill=black!30!green, inner sep=0pt,minimum size=5pt] (b) at (-3,0) {};
\node[above left=1pt of {(-3,0)}, black!30!green, outer sep=2pt,fill=none] {$B_1(-3,0)$};
\node[circle,draw=red, fill=red, inner sep=0pt,minimum size=5pt] (b) at (9,-16) {};
\node[right=1pt of {(9,-16)}, red, outer sep=2pt,fill=none] {$B_2(9,-16)$};
\draw[-,blue] (-2,7) -- (7,-5);
\draw[-,black!30!green] (-2,7) -- (-3,0);
\draw[-,black!30!green] (7,-5) -- (-3,0);
\draw[-,red] (-2,7) -- (9,-16);
\draw[-,red] (7,-5) -- (9,-16);
\end{tikzpicture}​
 
This is simpler. I like your new idea, thanks !
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top