Analytical solution of the Photon Diffusion Equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the analytical solution of the photon diffusion equation, specifically focusing on deriving results without employing Monte Carlo techniques. The original poster presents equations related to photon diffusion and attempts to find a time-independent solution and transmission through a slab.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive a time-independent solution from the photon diffusion equation and seeks to integrate to find transmission. Some participants question the correctness of the presented equations and suggest alternative integration methods. Others raise concerns about the assumptions regarding the direction of propagation and the role of slab thickness.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on the equations presented. Some guidance has been offered regarding integration methods, and there are indications of differing interpretations of the problem setup, particularly concerning the geometry of the slab.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential confusion regarding the integration limits and the physical interpretation of the variables involved, particularly the direction of propagation and the slab thickness. The original poster expresses a desire for further resources or derivations to aid in their understanding.

Stearge
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello, I am currently working on photon diffusion equation and trying to do it without using Monte Carlo technique.

Homework Equations


Starting equation integrated over t:
int(c*exp(-r^2/(4*D*c*t)-a*c*t)/(4*Pi*D*c*t)^(3/2), t = 0 .. infinity) (1)
Result:
sqrt(r^2/(D*c))*exp(-sqrt(a*c)*sqrt(r^2/(D*c)))*D*c^2/(4*r^2*Pi*sqrt(D^3*c^3)) (2)
Integral to find transmission:
int(exp(-sqrt(a*c*(1/(D*c)))*sqrt(x^2+y^2))/(4*Pi*D*sqrt(x^2+y^2)), x = -infinity .. infinity) (3)

The Attempt at a Solution


I have started with homogeneous solution calculating flux at a given point and a given time (1).
First, I integrated it over the time to get the time independent solution as it can be seen above. It gave me the flux at any given point independent of time (2).
The second thing I wanted to obtain from it is transmission, which I think should be obtainable by converting to Cartesian coordinates (r^2 = x^2+y^2) and integrating over x while keeping y constant (slab thickness) (3).
Here I am a bit stuck. I was trying to find table integrals or alternative solutions (I think there is a way to represent it using Bessel function). I would be very grateful if someone could help with this integral or point me towards the textbook with good derivation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:welcome:
## \\ ## Equation (3) looks incorrect to me. ## \\ ##Why don't you simply integrate equation (2) over ## dx dy=2 \pi r \, dr ## to get the final result?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
Charles Link said:
:welcome:
## \\ ## Equation (3) looks incorrect to me. ## \\ ##Why don't you simply integrate equation (2) over ## dx dy=2 \pi r \, dr ## to get the final result?
Thank you for reply
I am integrating only over dx because y is thickness of the slab and I want to find number of photons on output facet.
 
I'll need to study it further. Usually in these Optics problems, "z" is the direction of propagation, and that is evidenced by your equation for the intensity ## I(x,y) ## as the number of photons (or energy) per unit time per unit area is symmetric in "x" and "y". Check your equation again and see if the slab thickness isn't in the "z" direction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
771
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K