Analyzing a String System: Calculating M for Equilibrium

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two pulleys connected by a string, where participants analyze the conditions for equilibrium and the implications of the system's setup. The focus includes theoretical considerations, assumptions about mass and tension, and the clarity of the problem statement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express concern about the clarity of the problem statement, suggesting it lacks explicit time constraints for equilibrium.
  • Others argue that the wording is sufficient for those expected to solve it, comparing it to idealized scenarios in other physics problems.
  • A participant notes that the moment of inertia of the pulleys is not mentioned, which could affect the analysis of tensions and torques.
  • One participant proposes that for equilibrium, the mass M should equal 9 kg, based on balancing the weights on both sides of the pulleys.
  • Another participant disagrees with the conclusion that M = 9 kg, arguing that different tensions must be considered and that the heavier weight is falling, indicating a lack of true equilibrium.
  • Concerns are raised about the assumption of a massless rope, with implications for the tension being uniform across the system.
  • One participant calculates the tension in the rope of the sub pulleys and questions whether the total weight exerted on the main pulley includes both the sub pulley's weight and the tension.
  • A later reply supports the initial calculation of tension but emphasizes the need to consider the system's dynamics until one side reaches a limit.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the clarity of the problem statement or the value of M. Multiple competing views on the assumptions regarding tension, mass, and equilibrium remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the problem's assumptions, such as the treatment of pulleys as mass points and the implications of assuming massless ropes. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of the physical setup and its effects on the analysis.

wirefree
Messages
110
Reaction score
21
23h0rac.jpg

Question: Two pulleys of masses 12 kg and 8 kg are connected by a fine string hanging over a fixed pulley as shown. Over the 8 kg pulley is hung a fine string with masses 4 kg and M. Over the 12 kg pulley is hung another fine string with masses 3 kg and 6 kg. Calculate M so that the string over the fixed pulley remains stationary.


Problem: The question places no demands on how long the setup must remain stationary. In time, it will snap out of equilibrium, i.e., when the heavier of the two masses in the two two-mass-string sub-system falls to one side, the 12 kg and 8 kg masses are all that will remain. And then that two will collapse to one side.

So the question demands me to comment on the very brief period of time for which the system will be in equilibrium. This lack of explicit time-bound requirement on the solution discouraged me to proceed with the solution for a very long time.

Can we all agree that the question could be clearer in its wordings? Or is the information sufficient for some of you?

Would appreciate all thoughts.


wirefree

P.S. I don't seek the solution to the question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes i guess it is as you saying, but how "brief" that period can be, depends. For example if the length of the strings on each side of the sub system pulleys is too big that period may not be so brief afterall :). Of course one could say that in real life those strings can't be too big , but in theory we can make the strings as big in length as we want.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
wirefree said:
Can we all agree that the question could be clearer in its wordings? Or is the information sufficient for some of you?

Would appreciate all thoughts.


wirefree

P.S. I don't seek the solution to the question.

Actually, I don't think the wording is too sparse. This assumes that the question is aimed at people who are expected to be able to answer it. It is like the ideal circuit diagram, given in an electronics problem. The time involved in the answer is not really relevant, imo; you are asked to consider what will happen before any limit is reached, given the data, which is fair enough and will give an answer.

As far as I can see, the only thing that is missing is the statement about the Moment of Inertia of the pulleys. I think a finite MI could affect the situation because some torque is required to get the pulleys to move and that must (?) affect the tensions in the strings. Giving the pulleys a mass but no MI seems strange. Perhaps someone will be able to put me right on that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
If the two hanging pulleys are treated as mass points then the stationary condition is met when the left weighs the same as the right; this occurs when M=9 kg.

It doesn't matter where the weights on two pulleys end up, as long as they weigh the same.

As sophiecentaur points out, there is insufficient information for balancing of torques.
 
I do not agree with M = 9. That assumed there are different tensions in the pulleys with unequal weights. But the tension must be the same on both sides of a pulley. There is less force needed to support the pulleys than you'd think because the heavier of the two weights is actually falling. It is not equilibrium, as the left hand pulley tells you.
 
Last edited:
sophiecentaur said:
I do not agree with M = 9. That assumed there are different tensions in the pulleys with unequal weights. But the tension must be the same on both sides of a pulley. There is less force needed to support the pulleys than you'd think because the heavier of the two weights is actually falling. It is not equilibrium, as the left hand pulley tells you.

If we don't assume a massless rope, the tension can't be the same everywhere cause there must be net force to accelerate the rope.

If we assume massless rope i *think* there is a problem because the way i see it, the weights on each side of the rope in the sub pulley exert a force on the rope and the rope exerts a force on the pulley. Because the rope is in accelerating motion these two forces need not be the same.
 
Last edited:
The string is "fine" (=massless) in the OP. I have assumed the pulleys have no MI - but I will agree that the model is a bit selective. If you can't assume the above then there is no solution.
Tension can be the same as long as the heavy mass is pulling the lighter mass up (and vice versa) the force is the difference in weights and the accelerated mass is their total mass.
 
Assuming massless rope and pulleys with no MI, i ve calculated the tension in the rope of the sub pulleys as [tex]T=\frac{2m_1m_2}{m_1+m_2}g[/tex]. Is this correct or not? Can we say that the phenomenal weight the sub pulley exerts to the main pulley is (sub pulley's weight)+2T?
 
I reckon that's the right starting point. Then you assume the top pulley remains stationary 'till one side or the other hits an end stop.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K