Analyzing E=MC2: What Does Energy Have to Do with Distance?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Makep
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E=mc2
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of the equation E=mc², specifically examining the relationship between energy and distance. Participants analyze the dimensional aspects of the equation and explore the implications of these interpretations within the context of Einstein's relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant analyzes E=mc² dimensionally, suggesting that energy has a factor of distance or space, and questions whether this interpretation is correct.
  • Another participant points out that the units kg(m/s²) correspond to force, not energy, and clarifies that energy is represented by kg(m²/s²) as per E=mc².
  • A later reply acknowledges the correction regarding the units of energy.
  • Another participant notes that mc² has the same units as (1/2)mv², relating it to kinetic energy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the dimensional analysis of E=mc² and its implications. There is no consensus on the interpretation of energy in relation to distance, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding the definitions of energy and distance may be implicit in the discussion. The relationship between energy and distance is not fully explored, leaving room for further clarification.

Makep
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
By analyzing E=MC2 dimensionally, we will get these results.

kgM/S2 = kg(M2/S2)
= kg(m)(m/s2)
= kgm/s2(m)
= E x distance

E != Es where E = energy and s = distance or displacement. What we are seeing here with Einstein's relativity is that energy has a factor of distance or space as well. Is this wrong or can soeone correct me on this, please?

Es is no longer energy but something else and should be treated as such, I believe.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kg\frac { m} {s^2} = Mass x acceleration is the units of Force, not energy. Energy is kg\frac { m^2} {s^2} just like in E = m c^2
 
Thanks for the correction.
 
Of course, mc2 has the same units as (1/2)mv2, the kinetic energy.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad E=mc2: What is the Term for this Energy?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Undergrad Is E=mc2 About Converting Mass to Energy?
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
High School What Does the 'E' in E=mc² Really Represent: Total Energy or Mass Energy?
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
9K
High School Does Energy Have Mass and Other Beginner Physics Questions?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Undergrad Andrei Lebed: Hydrogen Spectral Transitions Without Gravity
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Undergrad Electromagnetic Fields and the manipulation of Space-Time
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Undergrad Some thoughts about Bell's string paradox alternatives
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
7K
Undergrad What determines if wave components are independent vs coherent?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
821
Undergrad Relativistic Mass Calculation with 4th Dimensional Vector
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
High School How does Einstein's equation work? Why do we need to square c?
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K