1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Analyzing perturbation of vectors

  1. Feb 24, 2013 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    We have [itex]A \in R^{mxm} \text{ and } b \in R^{m} \text{ and } b \neq 0 \text{. Show that } Ax = b \text{ and } A(x+ \delta x) = b+ \delta b [/itex]


    3. The attempt at a solution

    I did the first part just by the definition of A being non singular. The second part is tripping me up though. Not sure how to tackle it. I looked at the backwards stability but it just confused me more. Any help would be most appreciated.
     
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2013
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 24, 2013 #2

    LCKurtz

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    If ##Ax=b## doesn't ##A(x+\delta x)= b +\delta b## just follow by linearity?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Analyzing perturbation of vectors
  1. Singular perturbation (Replies: 1)

  2. Analyze the continuity (Replies: 1)

Loading...