Analyzing the Circulation Problem: Is There a Simpler Solution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nikitin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to complex analysis, specifically focusing on the application of Cauchy's differentiation formula in the context of a circulation problem involving the function \( f(z) = e^{-z} \). Participants are exploring the analytic nature of the function and the implications for solving the assigned problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the analytic properties of the function \( e^{-z} \) and the implications for using Cauchy's differentiation formula. There are attempts to outline a strategy for solving the problem, including questions about the behavior of derivatives at specific points.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on potential steps to take, while others express uncertainty about the correctness of their results. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between the derivatives and the expected outcomes, with no explicit consensus reached regarding the final answer.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the complexities of the problem, including potential discrepancies between their findings and those presented in a solution appendix from a textbook. There is a recognition of the need to clarify assumptions and definitions related to the problem.

Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27

Homework Statement


https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/1395894_10201699046814591_1790916582_n.jpg

Assignment 3.

Homework Equations


Cauchy's differentiation formula
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy's_integral_formula

The Attempt at a Solution



I checked if ##f(z) = e^{-z}## is analytic, and it is not. So it seems I have to do the circulation the hard way: parametrize z into ##z(t) = \cos(t) +i \sin(t)##

But that sounds like a bad way to do it. So you guys got any better ideas? Maybe I am missing something?

thanks for all help! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why is e-z not analytic?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Oh right. Now that I have rested a bit at home I see it is obviously analytic. how stupid of me.

Anyway, how do I solve it?

I guess the strategy should be something like this?

1) Apply Cauchy's differentiation formula, with ##z_0 = 0## and ##f(z_0) = e^{-z_0}##
2) Rearrange so the integral in assignment 3 is a function of ##f^{(n)} (z_0)##.
3) Find ##f^{(n)}##.

Err, how do I do step 3? Won't ##f^{(n)}## vary between being zero and 1 after inserting ##z_0 = 0##, depending on the value of n?
 
Last edited:
Nikitin said:
Oh right. Now that I have rested a bit at home I see it is obviously analytic. how stupid of me.

Anyway, how do I solve it?

I guess the strategy should be something like this?

1) Apply Cauchy's differentiation formula, with ##z_0 = 0## and ##f(z_0) = e^{-z_0}##
2) Rearrange so the integral in assignment 3 is a function of ##f^{(n)} (z_0)##.
3) Find ##f^{(n)}##.

Err, how do I do step 3? Won't ##f^{(n)}## vary between being zero and 1 after inserting ##z_0 = 0##, depending on the value of n?

You are making this sound a lot more elaborate than it is. Just do it. Try a few examples, like n=1 and n=2 first. Sure ##f^{(n)}(0)## will depend on n. But it doesn't vary between zero and one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Yes, you're right.

But I end up with

[tex]\frac{2 \pi}{(n-1)!} \cdot (-1)^{n-1} i[/tex]

while the correct answer is just

[tex]\frac{2 \pi}{(n-1)!}[/tex]
 
Nikitin said:
Yes, you're right.

But I end up with

[tex]\frac{2 \pi}{(n-1)!} \cdot (-1)^{n-1} i[/tex]

while the correct answer is just

[tex]\frac{2 \pi}{(n-1)!}[/tex]

That 'correct answer' doesn't look correct to me. I agree with your answer.
 
OK, thanks! :) I guess my book's solution-appendix is wrong on this assignment.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K