MHB Angle between two line segments of a cube.

  • Thread starter Thread starter IHateFactorial
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Cube Line
IHateFactorial
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Given a cube, choose a vertice and draw 2 of the three possible diagonals. What is the measure of the angel between those two diagonals?

Proposed answer: We can say that both diagonals touch vertice A, to give it a name. We can also call the endpoints of both diagonals B and C. If we imagine the diagonal that goes through points B and C, we can see that the points A, B, and C, all lie on the same plane and that they form an equilateral triangle. The measure of every angle in an equilateral triangle is 60°. The answer, I believe, is 60°.

Is this right? (Whether it is or isn't right, how can I apply this to any two line segments that share a point on the cube)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's correct, assuming "diagonal" means the diagonal of a face of the cube and the diagonals emanate from the chosen vertex. In order for me to answer the remaining question you'll have to be more specific about what application you are looking for. Do you mean finding the angles and lengths of triangles constructed in a similar fashion? By the way, any three points are contained in the same plane.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top