Angle of incidence and total internal reflection

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of total internal reflection and the angles involved. It clarifies that while the angle of incidence at point A is 40°, the answer key refers to the maximum angle of incidence being just less than 90° to achieve total internal reflection at point B. This is necessary to ensure the maximum angle of refraction is also considered. Participants are encouraged to think about ways to increase the angle of incidence at point B. Understanding these angles is crucial for applying the principles of total internal reflection effectively.
ellieee
Messages
78
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
qn: explain why a ray of light that enters the glass through surface A cannot be totally internally reflected at surface B.
Relevant Equations
n = sin I / sin r
the angle of incidence at A is 40°, then why did the answer key say "angle of incidence at A is just less than 90°". it is obvious that 40° is quite far from 90° right?
 

Attachments

  • Question 05-04-2021 20.50_3_edit_30096140460511.jpg
    Question 05-04-2021 20.50_3_edit_30096140460511.jpg
    50.5 KB · Views: 142
  • Question 05-04-2021 20.50_2_edit_30112012151134.jpg
    Question 05-04-2021 20.50_2_edit_30112012151134.jpg
    53.6 KB · Views: 149
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, and
:welcome: !​

Breaks my neck to look at your picture :mad:
ellieee said:
it is obvious that 40° is quite far from 90° right?
Yes, that is obvious. But to get a possible total internal refection at B, you need a maximum angle of refraction, and therefore a maximum angle of incidence. So they observe ( correctly :smile: !) that for a maximum angle of incidence at A
ellieee said:
angle of incidence at A is just less than 90°
##\ ##
 
BvU said:
you need a maximum angle of refraction, and therefore a maximum angle of incidence.
just to clarify, is it maximum angle of refraction and incidence at B ?
 
Can you think of a way to get a bigger angle of incidence at B ?
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Back
Top