Angle vs Time Graph: What is it Called?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tony873004
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles Graphing
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of a graph that represents angle versus time, specifically focusing on a circular representation to avoid discontinuities when angles transition from 359 degrees to 1 degree. Participants explore the terminology and conventions associated with such graphs, including the Archimedean spiral and its relation to plotting orbital elements over time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a circular graph for angle vs time to prevent discontinuities at angle transitions.
  • Another participant suggests that the graph may relate to polar coordinates, referencing a Wikipedia page.
  • A participant clarifies that the graph they envision would have time represented along the radius, with angles changing over time, and mentions the concept of shading for standard deviation.
  • There is mention of the Archimedean spiral as a specific case of the graph being discussed, but uncertainty exists regarding the general case's terminology.
  • One participant expresses a desire to create a graph of orbital elements vs time and questions the conventions for such a graph, including the direction of time and the placement of 0 degrees.
  • Another participant notes that the choice of graph type depends on the information being conveyed and suggests that time could be represented in various ways, including along a radius or as a varying radius.
  • There is a suggestion that time should increase with increasing radius and that placing zero angle to the right is a reasonable choice.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints regarding the terminology and conventions for the graph, with no consensus reached on a specific name or standard practice for the general case. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to represent orbital elements over time.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the potential for multiple graphing conventions and the importance of the specific data being represented, indicating that there may be no universally accepted standard for the graph type being discussed.

tony873004
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
143
I once saw a graph of angle vs time. In order to avoid a big shift in the graph when the angle crossed over from 359 degrees to 1 degree, this graph was circular, with time along the radius of the circle.

Is there a name for this type of graph?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
tony873004 said:
I once saw a graph of angle vs time. In order to avoid a big shift in the graph when the angle crossed over from 359 degrees to 1 degree, this graph was circular, with time along the radius of the circle.

Is there a name for this type of graph?
Do you mean something like this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_coordinate_system
 
Yes, except the 3 and 4 in that graph represent the magnitude of the vector. In the graph I'm think of (sorry, can't find a link to it at the moment), the 3 and 4 would represent time. The angle would change over time, so the green and blue lines would not be straight lines, and 1 standard deviation would be shaded around the line.
 
I meant, e.g. the graph of the Archimedean spiral on that Wiki-page. Polar coordinates is the closest I know to describe what you could have meant. Sorry, if it doesn't help.
 
Thanks, Archimedean spiral looks like the term I was searching for.
 
tony873004 said:
Thanks, Archimedean spiral looks like the term I was searching for.
Well, it is a special case of your graph, with constant derivative. I don't know if there is some name for the general case.
 
mfb said:
Well, it is a special case of your graph, with constant derivative. I don't know if there is some name for the general case.
Thanks, I noticed that after I posted. Archimedean spiral is just the data plotted in the type of graph I was describing.
The reason I'm asking is because I want to make such a graph of orbital elements vs. time, and if there is a convention that is commonly used I want to use that.
For example, would time run from the center to the circumference (that would be my guess), or from the circumference to the center? Is 0 degrees the along the +x axis? I'm also guessing yes. And if there is no convention, then I get to do it my way!
 
There are probably thousands of types of graphs out there. The 'right' choice depends only on which information has to be in it and then minimizing on how long it takes to read the information it provides. Whether the time starts or ends in the origin will likely depend on whether your data provide a starting or an ending point of time. Time might as well be along a radius or a varying radius like during the drawing of a spiral.
I guess you would have better chances to get a satisfying answer if you show us an example of how you would draw it and then read the feedbacks. (Sorry if I sounded strange, I'm lacking some English vocabulary.)
 
Orbital elements can have other critical points if the orbit changes over time.

Seeing such a plot, I would expect time to increase with increasing radius, and having zero angle to the right is probably a good choice as well.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
20K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 115 ·
4
Replies
115
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K