Angular acceleration of a pulsar

Click For Summary
A pulsar is a neutron star that emits radio pulses with a precise rotation period, currently measured at T = 0.19000000 s, which is increasing by 0.00000380 s/y. The angular velocity was calculated to be 33.07 rad/s using the formula 1/T*2PI. The user attempted to find angular acceleration using the rotational kinematic equation but faced issues with rounding errors in their calculations. It was suggested to maintain more significant figures for better accuracy in the angular velocity values. Accurate calculations are essential for determining the correct angular acceleration of the pulsar.
vertex78
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
A pulsar is a rapidly rotating neutron star that emits radio pulses with precise synchronization, there being one such pulse for each rotation of the star. The period T of rotation is found by measuring the time between pulses. At present, the pulsar in the central region of the Crab nebula has a period of rotation of T = 0.19000000 s, and this is observed to be increasing at the rate of 0.00000380 s/y.

I found the angular velocity to be 33.07 rad/s, I found this by 1/T*2PI

Now I need to solve the angular velocity. I tried using the rotational kinematic equation:
Wf = Wi + alpha * t

where:
Wf = angular velocity final
Wi = angular velocity initial
alpha = angular acceleration
t = time

Since the period of rotation is increasing by 0.00000380 s/y I added this to 0.19 and then found the Wf by take 1/.19000380 *2PI

I used the angular velocity that I already solved for Wi, the 33.07 rad/s

then for the time, it would be 1 year right? But does this need to be in seconds?

So I plugged these into the equation and solved for alpha

(Wf - Wi)/t = alpha
(33.068rad/s-33.069rad/s)/31556926s = -3.1689x10^-11 rad/s^2

But this is not the correct answer. Any advice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vertex78 said:
(Wf - Wi)/t = alpha
(33.068rad/s-33.069rad/s)/31556926s = -3.1689x10^-11 rad/s^2

But this is not the correct answer. Any advice?
Your error is in rounding off your values for W. Use many more significant figures in your calculator and you get a better estimate for the change in W.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K