Angular Acceleration Problem Why am I not right?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the angular acceleration of blender blades that rotate at 7900 rpm and come to a stop in 4 seconds. The original poster expresses uncertainty about their conversion from rpm to radians per second and the subsequent calculation of angular acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conversion from rpm to rad/sec, with one suggesting a method involving the formula (rpm * 2π)/60. There is also a focus on whether the calculated angular acceleration is in the correct units and if the sign of the acceleration should be positive or negative.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring the conversion process and the implications of sign conventions in angular acceleration. Some guidance has been offered regarding unit consistency, but there is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the final answer.

Contextual Notes

The original poster questions their conversion accuracy and the assumptions regarding directionality in the problem, indicating potential ambiguity in the question's setup.

tjohn101
Messages
92
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The blades in a blender rotate at a rate of 7900 rpm. When the motor is turned off during operation, the blades slow to rest in 4.0 s. What is the angular acceleration as the blades slow down?

Vi= 7900 rpm = 82.72860654 rad/sec (This may be my error)
Vf= 0
t= 4 secs

Homework Equations


<br /> v = v_0 + a t<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried solving for a in the answer above but the answer is incorrect.. I did:

0 = 82.72860654 + a(4)
and when solved got an answer of -20.68215164. I'm unsure of why this is NOT correct. Any help is greatly appreciated.

I think the problem may be in my conversions to rad/sec or maybe I am forgetting to convert something.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tjohn101 said:
Vi= 7900 rpm = 82.72860654 rad/sec (This may be my error)
You're off by a factor of ten.
 
Doc Al said:
You're off by a factor of ten.

Please tell me if this is the right method:

(7900*2pi)/60

If I do this then I get 827.2860654. Does that sound correct?
 
tjohn101 said:
Please tell me if this is the right method:

(7900*2pi)/60

If I do this then I get 827.2860654. Does that sound correct?
Perfect!
 
Doc Al said:
Perfect!

Okay, and when I solve using the equation above I get the acceleration as being -206.8215164. It is already in rad/sec^2, correct? No conversions needed there?
 
tjohn101 said:
Okay, and when I solve using the equation above I get the acceleration as being -206.8215164. It is already in rad/sec^2, correct? No conversions needed there?
Correct. You are computing Δω/Δt, so the units take care of themselves (since you already converted everything to standard units): (rad/s)/(s) = rad/s^2.
 
Doc Al said:
Correct. You are computing Δω/Δt, so the units take care of themselves (since you already converted everything to standard units): (rad/s)/(s) = rad/s^2.

Now there is one small problem. The answer is wrong. Would it be positive?
 
tjohn101 said:
Now there is one small problem. The answer is wrong. Would it be positive?
The question is ambiguous as to sign, since no direction or sign convention was given. I would just give the magnitude of the acceleration.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K