Angular Momentum Problem: Torque after fall

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an angular momentum problem involving torque and the effects of gravity on a falling object. Participants explore the relationship between angular momentum, torque, and the calculations involved in determining these quantities.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of final velocity and momentum, questioning the necessity of momentum in finding angular momentum. There is confusion regarding the correct formula for torque and its relationship to angular momentum. Some participants suggest that the problem lacks clarity in its instructions.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered insights into the definitions of torque and angular momentum, while others are exploring the implications of time in the calculations. There is an ongoing examination of the assumptions made in the problem setup, with no explicit consensus reached on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may contain extraneous details that do not aid in solving it, and there is uncertainty about the coverage of vector cross products in the participants' coursework. The timing of the object's fall is also discussed, with some suggesting that the problem could be clearer for first-year students.

JoeyBob
Messages
256
Reaction score
29
Homework Statement
See attached
Relevant Equations
Torque=change in angular momentum
I know how to get to the answer but that's what is confusing me.

To find final velocity I multiply the acceleration by the time the object fell.

Then multiply the velocity by the mass to get momentum.

Now the angular momentum is r x p.

Since the initial angular momentum was 0, this was also the change in angular momentum.

The problem is that to solve this youre not suppose to multiply by the time. You are suppose to do r*a*d*m to get the answer (599.56).

Why don't I need the momentum to find the angular momentum here??
 

Attachments

  • Question.PNG
    Question.PNG
    11.1 KB · Views: 194
Physics news on Phys.org
Torque=rate of change in angular momentum w.r.t. time.
It is also ## \vec{r} \times \vec{F} ##, where the ## \times ## is a vector cross product.
## m \cdot a \cdot d ## should be the correct answer, where ## a=9.8 m/sec^2 ##. I don't get an ## r ## in the product.
We, as homework helpers, generally aren't supposed to give the answer, but this one is almost one that involves a definition. Meanwhile, vector cross products may not have been covered yet in your coursework.

The problem gives you a lot of extra detail, but really doesn't give you much direction in how to solve it.
 
Charles Link said:
Torque=rate of change in angular momentum w.r.t. time.
It is also ## \vec{r} \times \vec{F} ##, where the ## \times ## is a vector cross product.
## m \cdot a \cdot d ## should be the correct answer, where ## a=9.8 m/sec^2 ##. I don't get an ## r ## in the product.
We, as homework helpers, generally aren't supposed to give the answer, but this one is almost one that involves a definition. Meanwhile, vector cross products may not have been covered yet in your coursework.
Yeah I meant d.

So torque here would be d x force of gravity.

But isn't torque also the change in angular momentum? Why does calculating the change in angular momentum give the wrong answer?
 
The torque multiplied by the time will give the change in angular momentum.
Unless my arithmetic is off, they don't have ## h=at^2/2 ##, where ## a=9.8 ##.
I get that ## t \approx 19 ## seconds, when it hits the ground.
Maybe they wanted you to simply conclude that at ## t=15.8 ## seconds, the object hadn't reached the ground yet.
In any case, the problem could be a little more clear to the reader, especially when I think it is supposed to be for a first year student.
 
JoeyBob said:
torque here would be d x force of gravity.
Yes.
JoeyBob said:
isnt torque also the change in angular momentum?
No. A change in angular momentum is still an angular momentum, just as a change in velocity is dimensionally a velocity, not an acceleration.
Charles Link said:
Maybe they wanted you to simply conclude that at t=15.8 seconds, the object hadn't reached the ground yet.
It asks for the torque due to gravity, so whether it has hit the ground is irrelevant. I think they are just leaving open the possibility that the torque varies with time ("##\tau(t)##"), and it is up to the student to figure out that it doesn't.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K