What is the Angular Equivalent of E=mc^2?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the search for an angular equivalent of the equation E=mc^2. Participants outline analogies between linear and angular quantities, such as mass to moment of inertia, and velocity to angular velocity. The conversion of linear kinetic energy to rotational kinetic energy is highlighted with the formula ##\frac{1}{2}mv^2 \rightarrow \frac{1}{2} I \omega^2##. However, it is concluded that E=mc^2 does not have a direct angular counterpart, as energy is a broader concept applicable to both linear and angular motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear and angular motion concepts
  • Familiarity with moment of inertia and angular velocity
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy equations
  • Basic grasp of physics terminology related to energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the relationship between linear and angular momentum
  • Explore the implications of rotational kinetic energy in physics
  • Study the concept of torque and its applications
  • Investigate advanced topics in classical mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and professionals interested in the relationships between linear and angular motion, as well as those exploring advanced mechanics concepts.

neuralnova
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Many linear quantities have angular counterparts.

Mass --> Moment of inertia
velocity --> angular velocity
acceleration --> angular acceleration
force --> torque
momentum --> angular momentum

E = mc^2 --> ? = I ?^2

Even a loose analogy would do.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Linear kinetic energy -> rotational kinetic energy
 
Or mathematically, ##\frac{1}{2}mv^2 \rightarrow \frac{1}{2} I \omega^2##.
 
Sure -- I should have included those in my list, as I did already know about them. I'm looking for something more daring. ;)
 
neuralnova said:
I'm looking for something more daring.
mc^2 is not related to linear or angular motion, so I'm not sure in what sense there can be an "angular counterpart".
 
Energy isn't linear by default, it's a more general concept that can be applied to both linear and angular motion.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
685
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
2K