Angular Magnification of a telescope,

Click For Summary
To calculate the angular magnification of a telescope with a mirror radius of curvature of 14.0 m and an eyepiece focal length of 19.0 cm, the necessary equations and understanding of magnification principles are essential. The original poster is struggling due to a lack of provided equations and guidance from their teacher. Responses emphasize the importance of demonstrating understanding and effort in problem-solving, rather than simply seeking answers. Clarification on the educational context, such as the nature of a "cyberclass," is also suggested to facilitate better assistance. Overall, a deeper engagement with the problem is encouraged for effective learning.
Bleitergast
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A telescope consists of a mirror with radius of curvature 14.0 m and an eyepiece of focal length 19.0 cm. Approximately what is the value of its angular magnification

I haven't yet been asked to find angular magnification given such little detail, my cyber-school program doesn't give me the necessary equation for this particular problem and my teacher is on vacation so if someone could give me a tiny hint I'd be tickled pink.


Homework Equations


m=height of image/height of object (my cyberschool says it's useful but I disagree)


The Attempt at a Solution


no clue
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Bleiter, and welcome to PF.

Looks like you are ill-equipped to deal with the exercise at hand! Just quoting the definition of magnification factor doesn't suffice under 2. and "no clue" under 3. doesn't count at all. In fact, the folks at PF don't just dislike that, they even put it in the rules, which please get acquainted with.

It's not just for you, also for potential helping hands: I for instance have no idea what a cyberclass is and whether that is before a PhD or beyond.

So show a little more, google around and tell us where precisely you get stuck. Would the same exercise but with a Galilean telescope be a piece of cake for you, or would it leave you equally clueless?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
988
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K