Angular momentum and its uncertainty

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of angular momentum in quantum mechanics, particularly focusing on the implications of angular momentum being zero in the context of the hydrogen atom and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Participants explore theoretical aspects, counterintuitive phenomena, and the relationship between angular momentum and electron behavior in atomic systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that for angular momentum, the uncertainty relation suggests that if the modulus squared of angular momentum is zero, then all components must also be zero, raising questions about the application of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
  • Another participant explains that if the expectation value of angular momentum in the z-direction is zero, the uncertainties in the x and y directions can also be zero, allowing for a state of definite angular momentum when it is zero.
  • A participant expresses curiosity about why an electron with zero angular momentum does not fall into the nucleus, suggesting that quantum mechanics allows for three-dimensional motion despite the absence of angular momentum.
  • Another participant adds that classical interpretations may not apply and mentions the existence of stationary solutions to the Schrödinger equation with L=0, but admits uncertainty about the physical implications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of zero angular momentum and its relationship to electron behavior, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the limitations of classical mechanics in interpreting quantum phenomena, and there are unresolved questions regarding the physical interpretation of zero angular momentum states.

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,933
Reaction score
283
[L_x,L_y]=i \hbar L_z \neq 0. In fact it seems we can know only the modulus squared of the angular momentum and one component, at a same time.
However if I take an electron say in the fundamental state in the hydrogen atom, L=0. Since the modulus squared is equal to 0, it means that all components are worth 0 or I'm missing something? Wouldn't that mean that we can know "the 3 components of the angular momentum without any uncertainty when it's worth 0"? Where does the Heisenberg's uncertainty principle applies here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The uncertainty relation in general states that \Delta A\Delta B\geq\frac{1}{2}\left|\left\langle \left[\hat{A},\hat{B}\right]\right\rangle\right|. For angular momentum, this takes the form \Delta L_{x}\Delta L_{y}\geq\frac{\hbar}{2}\left|\left\langle L_{z}\right\rangle\right|. Thus, if the expectation value of angular momentum in the z-direction is zero, the uncertainties in angular momentum in the x and y directions can be zero. By similar reasoning reasoning, you can see that if expectation values of angular momentum are zero in all three directions, then uncertainty in angular momentum can also be zero in all three directions, and thus the system can be in a state of definite angular momentum in all three directions as long as the angular momentum is zero.
 
Ok thank you very much for the information. :)
 
The more counterintuitive thing about the L=0 states is that even though the electron has no angular momenum, it doesn't fall into the nucleus. Do you know why?
 
lugita15 said:
The more counterintuitive thing about the L=0 states is that even though the electron has no angular momenum, it doesn't fall into the nucleus. Do you know why?

No, I don't really know why. But I've learned that in QM a central force does not imply a motion in a plane unlike in classical mechanics. It implies a motion in 3 dimensions, so it does not seem strange to me that a vanishing angular momentum doesn't imply the electron to "fall into the nucleous".
Adding the fact that the electron hasn't a well defined position, stopping to think things classically would help.
To answer your question mathematically, I think that the Schrödinger's equation has a stationary solution with L=0. But physically I don't know the answer. I would love to read it though :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
768
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
943
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K