If one can't ever know all the three components of (QM) angular momentum, then can it even be considered as a "vector"?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Is it only cause it transforms as a vector in a coordinate transformation?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Angular Momentum, classical vector analogy?

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Angular Momentum classical |
---|

I Spin Angular Momentum Dirac Equation |

I Macroscopic rotation from spin flipping? |

I Optical angular momentum |

I Angular momentum state of a system |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**