Angular Momentum eigenstates, and tensor products

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of angular momentum eigenstates and the representation of wave functions in quantum mechanics, particularly focusing on the tensor product structure of state spaces involving variables such as radius (r), polar angle (theta), and azimuthal angle (phi). Participants explore the implications of these representations for the form of wave functions and the mathematical expansions involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the probability of angular momentum can be determined without knowing the function of r in the eigenfunction for Lz.
  • Another participant affirms that the state space can be viewed as a tensor product of functions of r, theta, and phi, but clarifies that not all state functions are simple products of these functions.
  • A participant suggests that state functions can be expressed as a sum of products of functions of the individual variables, indicating a more complex structure than mere products.
  • There is a mention of using a Taylor series for certain functions, although this is later questioned by another participant.
  • One participant corrects the notion of using a Taylor series, stating that spherical harmonics and other specific functions are more appropriate for the expansions in this context.
  • Participants discuss the use of different bases for the expansions, such as Legendre functions and Bessel functions, and the method for calculating coefficients through integrals.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the nature of wave functions and their expansions. While there is some agreement on the tensor product structure, there is no consensus on the specific forms of expansions or the appropriateness of using Taylor series in this context.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential misunderstanding of the types of expansions applicable to wave functions and the dependence on the definitions of the functions used in the expansions. The discussion does not resolve the appropriateness of different mathematical approaches.

darkSun
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
This is taken from a text problem, but I am putting it in this section because I think my question goes beyond the problem itself:

If a particle has a wave function psi = A*R(r)*cos2 (theta), for example, then if I want to find the probability that its angular momentum is l I would find the absolute value squared of

P(l) = <L=l|psi> .

But the eigenstates of the angular momentum operator are products of exp(i*l*theta/h) and an unspecified function of r. If I do the above integral, don't I have to know what the function of r in the eigenfunction for L is? (I mean Lz, to be precise).

This got me thinking--in this case, |psi> is a tensor product of kets from two Hilbert Spaces, a space with elements depending on r only and a space with elements depending on theta only, correct?

When such a product is put into the r, theta basis, the resulting wave function is a product of a function of r and a function of theta. So does this mean that all wave functions are like this, i.e. products of functions of one variable? In other words, it would be impossible to have a wave function like exp(i*r*theta), for instance? (Aside from the normalization problem)

Thanks for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you can regard the (spinless, for simplicity) particle's state space as a tensor product of functions of r, theta and phi. This doesn't mean that every state function is a product of 3 functions that depend separately on the 3 variables. Rather, you can expand each state function in something like

\psi(r,\theta,\phi)=\sum_{abc}c^{abc}f_a(r)g_b(\theta)h_c(\phi)

this is precisely the definition of tensor product.
 
Ah, and in the case of a function like psi = cos(r*theta*phi) or something, the expansion would be the Taylor Series. thanks dude
 
Or would it? I'm not sure I get it, actually.
 
It's not quite a Taylor series, its a different type of expansion. For the theta and phi you take the spherical harmonics, which are a base of the functions defined on the unit spherical surface. For the r part you can take a whole set of functions that are a base of the (0, infinity) interval (Legendere functions, Bessel functions, etc), and you get something like

\psi(r,\theta,\phi)=\sum_{nlm}c^{nlm}J_n(r)Y_{lm}(\theta,\phi)

The way to calculate the coefficients is to performs certain integrals. The meaning is essentially the same of Taylor expansion, only the base is different. In the case of taylor expansion the base are polinomials

1
r,\theta,\phi
r^2,\theta^2,\phi^2,r\theta,r\phi,\theta\phi

\dots

in other cases you have more complicated yet more useful functions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K