Angular momentum for a shrunken Earth

  • Thread starter hndalama
  • Start date
  • #1
32
0

Homework Statement


If the Earth, with a radius of 6400 km, were collapsed into a sphere of the same mass, having a radius of 10 km, what would be its rotational period?

Homework Equations


L = Iw

The Attempt at a Solution


I can solve this if the moment of inertia is given but since it isn't I was wondering if there is a way to solve it without knowing the moment of inertia.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
gneill
Mentor
20,937
2,878
I can solve this if the moment of inertia is given but since it isn't I was wondering if there is a way to solve it without knowing the moment of inertia.
If you at least know the form that the moment of inertia takes, then yes. Work out your result symbolically first using variables for the two moments of inertia.

By the way, I've changed your thread title to be more specific. Titles that are too generic are not allowed.
 
  • #3
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
17,396
7,289
This is unsolvable unless you know the initial and final mass distributions. It is likely that the person constructing the problem intended for you to assume that the spheres have homogeneous mass distributions but it really is not clear and therefore an ill posed question.
 
  • #4
32
0
I assume that the earths are to be considered as uniform spheres

if I take the moments of inertia as variables then:
x= moment of inertia of large earth
y=moment of inertia of small earth

angular velocity of large earth = 1rev/day = 7.27 *10-5 rad/s
x*7.27 *10-5 rad/s = y *w

I don't know what to do from there
 
  • #5
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
17,396
7,289
I assume that the earths are to be considered as uniform spheres
So what is the moment of inertia of a uniform sphere in terms of its mass and its radius?
 
  • #6
gneill
Mentor
20,937
2,878
I assume that the earths are to be considered as uniform spheres

if I take the moments of inertia as variables then:
x= moment of inertia of large earth
y=moment of inertia of small earth

angular velocity of large earth = 1rev/day = 7.27 *10-5 rad/s
x*7.27 *10-5 rad/s = y *w

I don't know what to do from there
Solve for w in terms of the other variables (and the constant angular velocity that you've introduced). What relationship do x and y have in the result?

Then you can do as @Orodruin suggests and look up the moment of inertia formula for a uniform solid sphere and apply it twice, or you can consider the form that the moment of inertia takes for rotationally symmetric mass distributions: things like disks and hoops and spheres all have moments of inertia that share a common form. You may not need the precise formula if many parts of the formulas cancel out in your solution...
 
  • #7
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
17,396
7,289
you can consider the form that the moment of inertia takes for rotationally symmetric mass distributions: things like disks and hoops and spheres all have moments of inertia that share a common form.
To be honest, you do not need the rotationally symmetric part. As long as you have the same geometry and mass, there is only one form that the moment of inertia can take based on the size of the object. This follows directly from dimensional analysis. In fact, this entire problem can be done using dimensional analysis (assuming the same type of mass distribution, i.e., just scaling it along with the size of the Earth.
 
  • #8
32
0
So what is the moment of inertia of a uniform sphere in terms of its mass and its radius?
I'm not sure, I would have to look it up.

If I treat the spheres as point masses then their moments of inertia will be mr2.
m(6400000)2 * 7.27 *10-5 = m (10000)2w
w =29.78 rad/s

so period is 2pi /29.78 = 0.21 s

is this what you meant?

you can consider the form that the moment of inertia takes for rotationally symmetric mass distributions: things like disks and hoops and spheres all have moments of inertia that share a common form.

TAs long as you have the same geometry and mass, there is only one form that the moment of inertia can take based on the size of the object. .
i don't know the 'common form' you're referring to. How can i find this form?

In fact, this entire problem can be done using dimensional analysis (assuming the same type of mass distribution, i.e., just scaling it along with the size of the Earth.
can you please show me how it can be done by dimensional analysis?
 
  • #9
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
17,396
7,289
can you please show me how it can be done by dimensional analysis?
Why don't you try it out yourself first? You have four dimensional variables and three independent physical dimensions. There will be only one dimensionless combination of those.
 
  • #10
32
0
Why don't you try it out yourself first? You have four dimensional variables and three independent physical dimensions. There will be only one dimensionless combination of those.

I wonder whether we are talking about the same thing. The dimensional analysis that I know about is a method used to convert units.
if I have a quantity in kg units then I can convert it to grams by using the conversion factor 1000g/kg so
x kg * 1000g/kg = x000 g (the kg cancel out.)

how can this solve the question?

If I take the angular momentum equation i wrote earlier:
x*7.27 *10-5 rad/s = y *w

I insert the units for the variables. I think the units for moment of inertia are kg*m2. so:
x (kg *m2) * 7.27 *10-5 rad/s = y (kg *m2) * w rad/s

both sides have the same units, so I can divide both sides by the units (kg*m2 * rad/s) to get a dimensionless equation.
(x * 7.27 *10-5 ) / y = w

I don't see how this brings me any closer to solving the problem. Is this what you mean?
 
  • #11
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
17,396
7,289
The dimensional analysis that I know about is a method used to convert units
That is not dimensional analysis, that is unit conversion. Dimensional analysis is using the physical dimension of the relevant quantities to deduce the possible functional form for their relationship.
 
  • #12
32
0
That is not dimensional analysis, that is unit conversion. Dimensional analysis is using the physical dimension of the relevant quantities to deduce the possible functional form for their relationship.
Okay, I haven't yet learnt dimensional analysis

Is the method I used to solve the problem by treating the earths as point masses the other method that you were referring to?

If I treat the spheres as point masses then their moments of inertia will be mr2.
m(6400000)2 * 7.27 *10-5 = m (10000)2w
w =29.78 rad/s

so period is 2pi /29.78 = 0.21 s
 

Related Threads on Angular momentum for a shrunken Earth

  • Last Post
2
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
25K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Top