Angular momentum of a rotating door

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The angular momentum of a rotating door, modeled as a rod of length L and mass M, just before it hits a stop is given by the formula L = M ω L (s/2 - L/3) ẑ. This calculation utilizes the parallel axis theorem to determine the moment of inertia about point S, which is distinct from the rotation point H. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying the angular velocity at the respective points and the contributions of both linear and rotational motion to the total angular momentum.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum and its mathematical representation
  • Familiarity with the parallel axis theorem in physics
  • Knowledge of moment of inertia calculations for rigid bodies
  • Basic principles of rotational dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of angular momentum for different shapes, focusing on rods and disks
  • Learn about the application of the parallel axis theorem in various contexts
  • Explore the relationship between linear and angular velocity in rotational systems
  • Investigate the effects of different pivot points on the moment of inertia
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying mechanics, engineers working with rotational systems, and anyone interested in the dynamics of rigid body motion.

bananabandana
Messages
112
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


A door ( a rod of length ##L##, mass ##M##) rotates with angular velocity ##\omega## about a point ## H ##, and approaches a stop at ##S##. ##H## and ##S## are along the same line, and separated by a distance ## s ##. Show that the angular momentum of the door about the point ##S## just before it hits the stop is:

$$ \mathbf{L} = M \omega L \bigg( \frac{s}{2} - \frac{l}{3}\bigg) \mathbf{\hat{z}} $$

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


- Use definition of angular momentum and apply parallel axis theorem.[/B]
Since rotation is about the z axis - (i.e the axis through ##H##) we have ## \vec{\omega} = \omega \mathbf{\hat{z}}## so:
$$ \mathbf{L} = I \omega \mathbf{\hat{z}} $$
Notation ## I_{s}## means "moment of inertia evaluated at S". The moment of inertia of a rod as described about the centre of mass is ## \frac{M}{12}L^{2}## so, by parallel axis theorem:
$$ I_{s} = \frac{M}{12}L^{2} +M\big( \frac{L}{2}-s\big)^{2} =\frac{ML^{2}}{3}+Ms^{2} -MLs$$

Therefore:
$$\mathbf{L} = M\omega\big(\frac{L^{2}}{3}+s^{2} -Ls\big)\mathbf{\hat{z}} $$
What has gone wrong??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are correct.

Is it really a lower case "l" in their answer?
 
CWatters said:
I think you are correct.

Is it really a lower case "l" in their answer?

Ah no, sorry - it should be ##L## . This was part of a final year exam question, so I'm pretty sure I must be wrong somewhere!
 
Hi guys,
bananabandana said:
Therefore:
$$\mathbf{L} = M\omega\big(\frac{L^{2}}{3}+s^{2} -Ls\big)\mathbf{\hat{z}}$$​
I agree, provided you use the ##\omega## around S, not the ##\omega## around H ... :rolleyes:
 
BvU said:
Hi guys,

I agree, provided you use the ##\omega## around S, not the ##\omega## around H ... :rolleyes:
Why aren't the two the same? Surely the whole system is connected and therefore has the same ##\omega##
 
No.
 
That's a bit short, I concede. Must admit I don't have the answer worked out in full, but this is what came to mind:
upload_2017-2-22_17-43-46.png
$$\theta {L\over 2} = - \theta' \left (s - {L\over 2}\right ) \Rightarrow \dot \theta {L\over 2} = -\dot \theta' \left (s - {L\over 2}\right )$$

(all for ##\theta \downarrow 0##, of course)

The least it does is give us a minus sign for s > L/2

My memory of the definition is ##\omega = {d\theta\over dt}##

H and S see different ##\theta## (or the same ##\vec v_{\rm c.o.m.}## from different distances)

PS I like the
bananabandana said:
H and S are along the same line
in the problem statement. Two points have this habit, so: does it mean something else ? ANd does that have a bearing on the problem ? I think not...
 
The book answer is correct.
The easiest way is to consider the door's motion as the sum of the linear motion of its mass centre and a rotation about that centre.
The linear motion leads to an angular momentum about S. The angular momentum about the mass centre can then be added to this.
Be careful with signs.
bananabandana said:
Why aren't the two the same? Surely the whole system is connected and therefore has the same ##\omega##
Yes.
Edit:
bananabandana said:
by parallel axis theorem:
The parallel axis theorem is for finding the moment of inertia about a point as a centre of rotation. S is not that.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes bananabandana and BvU
haruspex said:
The book answer is correct.
The easiest way is to consider the door's motion as the sum of the linear motion of its mass centre and a rotation about that centre.
The linear motion leads to an angular momentum about S. The angular momentum about the mass centre can then be added to this.
Be careful with signs.

Yes.
Edit:

The parallel axis theorem is for finding the moment of inertia about a point as a centre of rotation. S is not that.

Ah, of course. No, it's definitely not rotating about S. Thank you. Also realize now that the definition of the intertia tensor only involves motion about the centre of mass, so obviously it doesn't take the angular momentum relative to the origin at $S$ into account.

So then I get this- that the angular momentum about the centre of mass, ##\mathbf{L^{*}}## is given by:

$$ \mathbf{L^{*}} = I\omega \mathbf{\hat{z}} = -\frac{ML^{2}}{12}\mathbf{\hat{z}} $$

(It points down due to right hand rule)
The angular momentum of the centre of mass itself is then ## \mathbf{L_{CM}} ##:

$$ \mathbf{L_{CM}} = \mathbf{r_{CM}} \times \mathbf{p_{CM}} = M \ -\big(s-\frac{L}{2} \big) \mathbf{\hat{i}} \times -v_{CM} \mathbf{\hat{j}} = M\omega\big( s-\frac{L}{2}\big)\frac{L}{2} \mathbf{\hat{k}} $$
Where I've used the fact that the velocity of the centre of mass is the distance from the axis of rotation times the angular velocity ## \mathbf{v_{CM}} = \omega\frac{L}{2}\mathbf{\hat{j}} ##

So,yep:

$$ \mathbf{L} = \mathbf{L^{*}} + \mathbf{L_{CM}} = M\omega L\bigg( \frac{s}{2}-\frac{L}{3} \bigg)\mathbf{\hat{k}} $$Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes CWatters and BvU

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
814
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
910
Replies
335
Views
16K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
67
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K