Angular momentum of a thin spherical shell

Click For Summary
A thin spherical shell of radius 0.50 m and mass 15 kg rotating about its center has an angular momentum calculated using the moment of inertia formula L = Iω. The moment of inertia for a thin spherical shell is (2/3)mr², leading to an angular momentum of 12.5 kg m²/s when using the correct parameters. Confusion arose when applying the point mass formula L = r x mv, which is inappropriate for a spherical shell due to its mass distribution. The discussion clarified that while a hollow cylinder has all its mass at a distance R from the axis, a spherical shell does not, as points on its surface are at varying distances from the axis of rotation. Ultimately, the correct angular momentum for the shell is 12.5 kg m²/s, not 18.75 or 19 as previously suggested.
slr77
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
A thin spherical shell of radius R = 0.50 m and mass 15 kg rotates about the z-axis through its center and parallel to its axis. When the angular velocity is 5.0 rad/s, its angular momentum (in kg ⋅ m2/s) is approximately:

a . 15
b. 9.0
c. 12
d. 19
e. 25

Homework Equations


[/B]
L = r x mv
L = Iω
v = rω
Moment of inertia of thin spherical shell = (2/3)mr^2

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I seem to be getting different answer using the equations above and I can't figure out why.

v = 0.5 * 5 = 2.5
L = (0.5)(15)(2.5) = 18.75

and

L = (5)(2/3)(15)(0.5)^2 = 12.5

The answer is the first one (18.75) but where did I go wrong with the using L = Iω?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi slr77,

You didn't go wrong using the correct formula for the moment of inertia of a thin spherical shell. The correct answer to the problem is 12.5 kg m2 s-1.

L = r x mv applies to a point mass. The shell is not a point mass, and can't be treated as such as most of it is distributed at distances other than r from the axis of rotation.
 
Hey gneill,

The solution listed d (19) as the correct answer so I guess it's mistaken.

This has uncovered some confusion about this topic though. I thought a thin-walled spherical shell had all it's mass distributed a distance r from the center. A thin-walled how cylinder has I = MR^2 (which means that all it's mass distributed at a distance r from the axis of rotation, right? I could use r x mv in that case because then Iω = rmv). How does a spherical shell differ from this? Or am I thinking of thin-walled how cylinders incorrectly too?

edit: Ok, I think I understand. The axis of rotation of the sphere passes through the middle so there are points on the wall of the sphere that are less than r away from the axis of rotation. In the cases of the hollow cylinder, every point on the wall is r away from the axis of rotation
 
Last edited:
slr77 said:
Hey gneill,

The solution listed d (19) as the correct answer so I guess it's mistaken.

This has uncovered some confusion about this topic though. I thought a thin-walled spherical shell had all it's mass distributed a distance r from the center.
Correct. But the center is not an axis of rotation. The axis may pass through the center.
A thin-walled how cylinder has I = MR^2 (which means that all it's mass distributed at a distance r from the axis of rotation, right?
Right. All the mass is located at distance R from the axis of rotation.
I could use r x mv in that case because then Iω = rmv). How does a spherical shell differ from this? Or am I thinking of thin-walled how cylinders incorrectly too?
No, cylinder good, shell bad :smile:

Sketch the profile of a cylindrical shell and its axis of rotation. Draw perpendiculars from the axis to the shell. Are they all the same length? How about the case of a spherical shell?
 
slr77 said:
L = (5)(2/3)(15)(0.5)^2 = 12.5

The answer is the first one (18.75) but where did I go wrong with the using L = Iω?
Your answer is correct, theirs isn't.
A spherical shell and a right circular cylinder are fundamentally different geometries. Don't try to extrapolate from one to the other.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
858
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
335
Views
15K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
67
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
756
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K