Angular momentum operator justification

  • Thread starter adav
  • Start date
  • #1
1
0
One can represent the mean of the angular momentum operator as a vector. But what is the (mathematical) justification to represent the operator by a vector which has a direction that the operator has not. Yet worse, l(l+1) h2 is the proper value of operator L^2 and from such result it is assumed that (l(l+1))^1/2 is the length of operator L . Such trick-representation seems to be a strong convention, but it does not make it mathematically correct.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
53
6
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't l(l+2)h^2 the eigenvalues of the momentum operator? Operators don't have length, but certainly their eigenvalues do.
 

Related Threads on Angular momentum operator justification

  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
942
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
976
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
316
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
Top