Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Angular momentum operator justification

  1. Feb 1, 2015 #1
    One can represent the mean of the angular momentum operator as a vector. But what is the (mathematical) justification to represent the operator by a vector which has a direction that the operator has not. Yet worse, l(l+1) h2 is the proper value of operator L^2 and from such result it is assumed that (l(l+1))^1/2 is the length of operator L . Such trick-representation seems to be a strong convention, but it does not make it mathematically correct.
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 1, 2015 #2
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't l(l+2)h^2 the eigenvalues of the momentum operator? Operators don't have length, but certainly their eigenvalues do.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook