Angular momentum quantum numbers

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the allowed values of the total angular momentum quantum number j for a particle with spin s=3/2 and orbital angular momentum quantum number l=2. The angular momentum addition theorem is referenced, indicating that j can take values from l+s down to |l-s|. Participants clarify that the spin number s acts as the second angular momentum quantum number in this context. Additionally, it is confirmed that for a given principal quantum number n, the orbital angular momentum l can range from 0 to n-1, while the magnetic quantum number m can take values from -l to +l. Overall, the relationship between these quantum numbers is emphasized, highlighting their distinct roles in quantum mechanics.
captainjack2000
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What are the allowed values of the total angular momentum quantum number j for a particle with spin s=3/2 and orbital angular momentum quantum number l=2?

I know that the angular momentum addition theorem states that the allowed values for the total angular momentum quantum number j given two angular momentum j1 and j2 are
j=j1+j2 , j1+j2-1, ...j1-j2
where m=j, j-1,...-j
but I'm not sure how the spin number s relates to the second angular momentum quantum number.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
\hat{\vec{J}}=\hat{\vec{L}}+\hat{\vec{S}}

so j can be \frac{1}{2},\frac{3}{2},\frac{5}{2}
 
So you just consider spin number s to be the second angular momentum quantum number j2 ?
 
Also, what are the allowed values of m and l for a given value of n ?
Is it that l can be any value from 0 to n-1 and m can be any value from -l to +l ?

thanks
 
captainjack2000 said:
So you just consider spin number s to be the second angular momentum quantum number j2 ?
Yes, exactly.

captainjack2000 said:
Also, what are the allowed values of m and l for a given value of n ?
Is it that l can be any value from 0 to n-1 and m can be any value from -l to +l ?

thanks
Correct again! :smile:
 
Dear Captainjack2000, I wish I could do some help.

The state of a bounded particle around the nucleus is determined by ( or expressed in ) four quantum numbers:

main quantum number: n

angular magnitude quantum number: L

angular direction quantum number: m

spin quantum number: s
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tian WJ said:
1. s=3/2, L=2, hence j= {answer omitted}

Since we believe students learn more by figuring out the answers themselves, the policy at Physics Forums is to give help in the form of hints but not to give direct answers to the questions.
 
Dear Captainjack2000, I wish I could do some help.

The state of a bounded particle around the nucleu is determind by ( or expressed in ) four quantum numbers:

main quantum number: n

angular magnitude quantum number: L

angular direction quantum number: m

spin quantum number: s

As to a determined $n$, $L$ can be $0, 1, 2, ..., n-2, n-1$, and there are $n$ possible values of $L$. Recall that $n >= L+1$.

For each possible value of $L$, there are $2L+1$ possible values of $m$: $-L, -L+1, -L+2, ..., 0, 1, 2, ..., L$. Recall that $L >= |m|$.

For a bounded particle around the nucleu, with spin angular momentum $s$, orbital angular momentum $L$, the allowed values of the total angular momentum quantum number $j$ will be : $j = L+s, L+s-1, L+s-2, ..., |L-s|$.

Attention that the $L$ $s$ and $j$ are always positive, while $m$ can be negative. So the lower boundary of the total angular momentum quantum numbe $j$ is set to be the absolution of $L-s$, because $s$ can be larger than $L$ sometimes.

Now, let's get down to your questions concretely.

1. s=3/2, L=2, hence j={do it yourself}.

2. Does $s$ relates to $m$ ?--- Probaly not.

$ n, L, m $ are introduced in Schrodinger's non-relativistic approach, the wave function of the bounded particle depends on $ n, L, m $ only. $s$ comes into being naturally only via Dirac's relativistic approach, although in fact $m$ was introduced phenominologically before Dirac's work.

$L$ depends on $n$, $m$ depends on $L$ (or also $n$ !). $n, L, s$ live together in bounded states, yet $s$ is insintric charactars of elementary particles whenever they are bounded or free. And for a certain particle, $s$ is determined and could only has one value. Most particles have $s$ of $\sqrt{3}/2$, with the third component $+-1/2$ (the 3/2 you referred to is the third component of the total s of some special particle). Thus, $s$ depends on none of $ n, L, m $. Moreover, no mathematical relations between $s$ and $m$, too.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K