Angular Momentum: Understanding Forces & Equilibrium for Sliding Down Slides

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of angular momentum and the conditions for mechanical and static equilibrium, particularly in the context of a child sliding down a slide at constant speed. Participants explore the forces at play, including gravity, friction, and the normal force, and question the implications of these forces on equilibrium states.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand why a child sliding down a slide at constant speed is in mechanical equilibrium but not in static equilibrium, questioning the role of various forces involved. Other participants reference Newton's laws and clarify the definitions of equilibrium, discussing the implications of constant velocity versus rest.

Discussion Status

The discussion has progressed with participants providing clarifications regarding the definitions of mechanical and static equilibrium. Some have offered insights into the forces acting on the child, while others have engaged with the original poster's questions, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the scenario of a straight slide and the implications of curvature on the forces involved. There is an acknowledgment of the need for further exploration of the forces beyond gravity and friction.

jcais
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I read about angular momentum on wikipedia.com.

It states that a child sliding down a slide at constant speed would be in mechanical equilibrium but not in static equilbrium. Why? Is it because the child is not stationary? What kinds of forces are involved besides gravity and friction? Do they not cancel each other?

May seem like a dumb quesiton, but I just need a little push.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Newton stated that a body would remain at rest or continue at a uniform velocity unless acted upon by an unbalance external force. Does that help?

(It may be paraphrased but the basics are there)
 
jcais said:
I read about angular momentum on wikipedia.com.

It states that a child sliding down a slide at constant speed would be in mechanical equilibrium but not in static equilbrium. Why? Is it because the child is not stationary? What kinds of forces are involved besides gravity and friction? Do they not cancel each other?

May seem like a dumb quesiton, but I just need a little push.

Thanks!
A body is in equilibirum if the net force is zero [itex]\sum {\vec F} = 0[/itex]. This means that the acceleration is zero. Such a body is in mechanical equilibrium. But if the acceleration is zero, it can either be that the object moves at constant velocity or that it is at rest (with respect to some frame). If it moves at constant velocity it is in mechanical equilibrium (which had to do with forces) but not in static equilibirum (because it is in motion).

I am assuming that the slide is straight (no curvature). Otherwise in the curved part, the net force would not be zero.

The forces are: gravity, friction and the normal force.

Pat
 
It makes sense now. Thank you everyone. Have a great weekend! :-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K