Angular velocity and acceleration of a plank

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the angular velocity and acceleration of a horizontal plank with a frictionless axis of rotation, featuring a large mass at one end and a small mass at the other. The key conclusion is that as the plank rotates, the torque decreases, which leads to an increase in angular acceleration. The torque is defined by the equation τ = r F_perp, where the perpendicular force decreases as the plank tilts, resulting in a decrease in torque. Consequently, the angular velocity of the plank increases due to the non-zero angular acceleration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational dynamics and torque
  • Familiarity with the equations τ = I α and τ = r F_perp
  • Knowledge of angular velocity and angular acceleration concepts
  • Basic principles of gravity and its components in rotational systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between torque and angular acceleration in rotational motion
  • Explore the effects of mass distribution on angular dynamics
  • Learn about the conservation of angular momentum in rotating systems
  • Investigate real-world applications of angular velocity and acceleration in engineering
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of rotational motion and dynamics.

Kevodaboss
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A horizontal plank with a frictionless axis of rotation at its center has a large mass at one end and a small mass at the other end. It is held stationary and then released from rest. As the plank rotates (and before one end hits the ground), the magnitude of the angular acceleration of the plank (increases/decreases/or remains constant) and the magnitude of the angular velocity (increases/decreases/or remains constant) ?

Homework Equations


τ=I α
τ=r F_perp

The Attempt at a Solution


The solution to this problem is that τ=I α, therefore if torque decreases, then angular acceleration increases. Thus the magnitude angular velocity must be increasing, because the angular acceleration is nonzero.

However, I can't seem to figure out why the torque is decreasing in this problem. I know that τ=r F_perp, but how can I apply this to the problem? The lever arm obviously stays the same length. So is the perpendicular force decreasing because after the plank tilts downwards, the force of gravity downwards has both a horizontal component and a vertical component with respect to the plank (force of gravity stays the same)?

Thanks for reading! Any help is appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kevodaboss said:
The lever arm obviously stays the same length.
Usually the "lever arm" is defined as the perpendicular distance from the line of force to the axis of rotation. So by that definition, the lever arm decreases.

The length of the plank doesn't change, so I suspect that's what you meant.
Kevodaboss said:
So is the perpendicular force decreasing because after the plank tilts downwards, the force of gravity downwards has both a horizontal component and a vertical component with respect to the plank (force of gravity stays the same)?
Right. The component of the weight perpendicular to the plank decreases, so the torque decreases.
 
Ok, that makes sense. Thanks for the help!

Doc Al said:
Usually the "lever arm" is defined as the perpendicular distance from the line of force to the axis of rotation. So by that definition, the lever arm decreases.

The length of the plank doesn't change, so I suspect that's what you meant.

Right. The component of the weight perpendicular to the plank decreases, so the torque decreases.
 
Kevodaboss said:

The Attempt at a Solution


The solution to this problem is that τ=I α, therefore if torque decreases, then angular acceleration increases.

Check that.
 
CWatters said:
Check that.

What do you mean?
 
CWatters said:
Check that.

Oops never mind. I meant if torque decreases, angular acceleration decreases
 
Kevodaboss said:
Oops never mind. I meant if torque decreases, angular acceleration decreases
I had assumed you just messed up that sentence, since what followed didn't depend on it. (Otherwise I would have said something.)
 
Doc Al said:
I had assumed you just messed up that sentence, since what followed didn't depend on it. (Otherwise I would have said something.)

Yeah, just a typo. Thanks for all the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K