Solving Integral of ln(2x+1)dx with By Parts Method

  • Thread starter Thread starter mugzieee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral of ln(2x+1)dx can be effectively solved using the method of integration by parts. The initial substitution of u=ln(2x+1) leads to complications, but a more straightforward approach involves substituting u=2x+1, which simplifies the integral to (1/2)∫ln(u) du. This substitution allows for an easier integration process, ultimately yielding the correct answer. The discussion emphasizes the importance of substitution in solving integrals efficiently.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integration techniques, specifically integration by parts.
  • Familiarity with logarithmic functions and their properties.
  • Knowledge of substitution methods in calculus.
  • Basic differentiation skills to derive du from u.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the integration by parts formula and its applications in various integrals.
  • Learn about substitution methods in calculus, focusing on how to choose effective substitutions.
  • Practice solving integrals involving logarithmic functions, particularly using u-substitution.
  • Explore advanced integration techniques, including integration of products of functions.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians seeking to refine their integration skills, and anyone looking to enhance their understanding of logarithmic integrals.

mugzieee
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Hey guys i keep getting stuck with this:
integral of ( ln(2x+1)dx)
im supposed to use by parts
heres what i have done
u=ln(2x+1)
du=2/2x+1
dv=dx
v=x

then i apply the formula uv-vdu
and i end up with another integral I am supposed to use by parts for:
integral of(2x/2x+1 dx)
heres what i have done for that integral
u=2x
.5du=dx
dv=1/2x+1
v=ln(2x+1)

then i apply the formula again, and since i have the same integal i stared wit, i add it to the lef side etc etc... but i don't get the correct answer...what does it look lie I am doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Make a substitution first.

2x+1 = u

And then you'd have to integrate something proportional to \int \ln u \ du which is really easy.

Daniel.
 
Math is easy once you accept the fact that substitution is the way to go ;)
 
so make the u=2x+1 substitution in the first step of the problm?
 
Yes as dexter noted

\int \ln (2x+1) dx

u = 2x +1

du = 2dx

\int \ln (u) \frac{du}{2}
 
gotcha, thanx.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
601
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K