Another dynamics problem involving projectile kinematics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a dynamics problem involving projectile kinematics, specifically the calculation of the speed of a conveyor belt discharging sand at an angle. Participants explore the application of kinematic equations to determine the initial velocity required for the sand to reach a stockpile.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a problem involving a conveyor belt at a 20-degree angle and attempts to calculate the initial velocity using kinematic equations.
  • Another participant confirms the correctness of the equations used and requests to see the full equations to identify any errors.
  • A third participant details their approach, breaking down the initial velocity into x and y components and setting up equations for both horizontal and vertical motion.
  • There is a correction regarding the value of gravitational acceleration, with one participant noting that it should be 32 ft/s² instead of 9.81 m/s², which is acknowledged by the original poster as a mistake in their calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the use of kinematic equations, but there is disagreement regarding the correctness of the calculated initial velocity, with the original poster's result differing from the book's answer. The discussion remains unresolved as to whether the book's answer is correct or if the participant made a significant error.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about gravitational acceleration and the potential impact of unit conversions on the calculations. The participants have not fully resolved the discrepancies in their results.

Khamul
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Sand is discharged at A from a conveyor belt and falls onto the top of a stockpile at B. Knowing that the conveyor belt forms an angle \alpha= 20 degrees with the horizontal, determine the speed V0 of the belt.


Homework Equations


xf-xi=Vi,x*t
yf-yi=Vi,y*t - (1/2)(g)(t2)
Vi,x=Vi*cos(\theta)
Vi,y=Vi*sin(\theta)

The Attempt at a Solution


Hello again guys! I know this problem is very similar to the last one that had the snowballs, the only difference being that there is now an upwards 20 degree angle instead of it being flatly horizontal.

Using the values I could relate Vi to, I found the numerical value of the angle * Vi, and plugged the respective ones into the vertical and horizontal equations. I then found in the horizontal equation, what Vi equaled. After this, I plugged the Vi relation into the vertical equation, solved the time( I got t= 2.428 s ) and plugged the information in. I found the initial velocity to be 13.15 m/s...but the answer in the book says it is 23.8 ft/s.

Would anyone be so kind as to help me out with where I went wrong? Do I need to use the same equation I used for the vertical component as I do for the horizontal? Tieing into that question, does this angle mean that there is an acceleration in the horizontal component as well?

Thanks for any replies!


4. F.B.D.
Sorry it's really crude, but it illustrates everything nicely I believe.
kd046v.png

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Khamul! :smile:

(have a theta: θ :wink:)
Khamul said:

Homework Equations


xf-xi=Vi,x*t
yf-yi=Vi,y*t - (1/2)(g)(t2)
Vi,x=Vi*cos(\theta)
Vi,y=Vi*sin(\theta)

Those are the correct formulas.

Show us your full equations, so that we can see what's going wrong. :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Khamul! :smile:

(have a theta: θ :wink:)


Those are the correct formulas.

Show us your full equations, so that we can see what's going wrong. :smile:


Hello again, Tiny! Hooray, a θ! :biggrin:

And, alright--sorry if it gets a bit messy but i'll try and explain!

First, I set the x and y components of the initial velocity equal to the velocity times the appropriate trig/angle values:
Vi,x=Vi*cos(20) ---> Vi,x= Vi*(.9397)
Vi,y=Vi*sin(20) ---> Vi,y= Vi*(.3420)

After I found those, and knowing the x final and initial values were 30ft and 0ft respectively; and that the y initial and final values were 0ft and -18ft respectively, I created two equations:

-Vertical Component:
(yf-yi)=Vi,y*t - (1/2)*g*t2
--> -18ft=Vi*(.3420)*t-4.905t2

-Horizontal Component:
(xf-xi)=Vi,x*t
-->30=Vi*(.9397)*t


After this, I rearranged the horizontal component equation to:
30/[(.9397)*t] = Vi

I then plugged the Vi value into the vertical component equation, yielding;
-18ft=[30(.342)*t]/[.9397*t] - 4.905*t2.

The t's cancel, and simplifying further I got:
-18=10.918-4.905*t2
-->t2=5.896
--->t=2.428 s

After finding this value, I went back to both horizontal and vertical equations and subbed in my value for time, and I got Vi=13.14 ft/s.

And like I said..my book is claiming the answer is 23.8 ft/s though. Is it possible that my book is incorrect, or did I make a large blunder somewhere? :frown:
 
Hello Khamul! :smile:
Khamul said:
-Vertical Component:
(yf-yi)=Vi,y*t - (1/2)*g*t2
--> -18ft=Vi*(.3420)*t-4.905t2

erm :redface: … g is 32 :rolleyes:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hello Khamul! :smile:


erm :redface: … g is 32 :rolleyes:

:bugeye:
AHHHH! I can't believe I missed that, I was even going back checking units! :cry:

:shy: Thanks tiny-tim!...time for me to go facedesk for awhile.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
10K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K