Another Electric Charges Q about Leaves

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the behavior of charged leaves in an electroscope setup. Initially, a negatively charged rod touches the top, causing the leaves to separate. When a finger touches the top, it introduces a positive charge, leading the leaves to collapse together. Upon removing the finger, the leaves separate slightly but not fully, indicating they retain some charge. The conversation highlights confusion over the sequence of events and the implications of grounding in the charging process.
kiplings01
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


set up:(they three are all connected)

l (referred to as top)
/\ (the bottom two called "leaves")

- two leaves are separated when negatively charged rod touches the top of the (vertical thing that connects the two leaves at the bottom)

- when rod is taken away, and a finger is put on the top, the leaves collapse and touch each other.

- when hand is taken away, the leaves separate a little (not as much as the first step)

Q: what are the charges on the two leaves?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I guessed that that both leaves are negatively charged.. because they repel at the last step. the finger charges by contact? providing positive charges.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is something wrong with this question. Are you sure you are correct with the transcription? Usually the order is this:

rod approaches top but does not touch, leaves separate
finger touches, leaves drop
finger is removed, leaves still together
rod is taken away, leaves separate.It's possible that the person whose finger touched the electroscope had a net charge on him, but it is usually considered that the touching finger is "grounded." If the question is stated correctly, then the finger is not grounded (the leaves would remain at net zero charge).

But if the finger had a net charge, positive or negative, and it was touching the electroscope, then the leaves would not have dropped fully as long as the finger was in contact with the scope.

This scenario actually does happen often in the real world, but this is due to the influence of other net charges nearby (thank you Van der Graaff).
 
Sorry, you were right with the rod not touching. And the rod is still there when the finger touches the electroscope. But the question does not say that the leaves were still together when the finger was put on.. (because i was describing the three pictures that the question gave me to describee the process)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top