Another integral representation of the Riemann zeta function

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around an integral representation of the Riemann zeta function, specifically a new formulation that is claimed to be valid for all complex values of \( s \). The conversation includes derivations, evaluations, and checks for specific values of \( s \), as well as considerations of convergence and the implications of the representation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an integral representation of \( \zeta(s) \) and provides a detailed derivation, noting that it is similar to a previous representation but more complex.
  • Another participant suggests that the integral representation is valid under the condition \( \text{Re}(s) > 1 \) but mentions that this restriction can be removed later.
  • There is a discussion about the timing of responses to posted challenges, with some participants expressing a desire for more time for others to engage with the problem.
  • Participants express interest in evaluating the zeta function at specific points, such as \( s = 0 \) and \( s = -1 \), and share their calculations for these cases.
  • One participant mentions that finding \( \zeta'(0) \) from the representation is straightforward and provides a derivation that leads to a specific result.
  • Another participant references Binet's integral formula in relation to the derivative of the zeta function, indicating a connection to broader mathematical concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the validity and implications of the integral representation, with some agreeing on the calculations for specific values of \( s \) while others raise questions about the conditions and the completeness of the evaluations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the broader implications of the representation and its acceptance within the community.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the importance of checking the results for specific values of \( s \), indicating that assumptions about convergence and the behavior of the integral may affect the validity of the representation. There is also mention of the need for clarity in the derivations presented.

polygamma
Messages
227
Reaction score
0
Here is another integral representation of $\zeta(s)$ that is valid for all complex values of $s$.

It's similar to the first one, but a bit harder to derive.$ \displaystyle \zeta(s) = 2 \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\sin (s \arctan t)}{(1+t^{2})^{s/2} (e^{2 \pi t} - 1)} \ dt + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{s-1}$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe I'm jumping the gun, but it doesn't look like anyone is going to attempt this one either.Again I'm going to add the restriction that $\text{Re}(s) >1$ which can be removed at the end.$ \displaystyle \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\sin (s \arctan t)}{(1+t^{2})^{s/2} (e^{2 \pi t} - 1)} \ dt = \int_{0}^{\infty} \text{Im} \ \frac{1}{(1-it)^{s} (e^{2 \pi t}-1)} \ dt $I'm leaving the imaginary sign inside of the integral since bringing it outside would result in a divergent integral.\displaystyle = \int_{0}^{\infty} \text{Im} \ \frac{1}{(1-it)^{s}} \frac{e^{-\pi t}}{e^{\pi t}-e^{- \pi t}} \ dt = \frac{1}{2} \int_{0}^{\infty} \text{Im} \ \frac{1}{(1-it)^{s}} \Big( \frac{e^{\pi t} + e^{\pi t}}{e^{\pi t} - e^{- \pi t}} -1 \Big) \ dt

\displaystyle = \frac{1}{2} \int_{0}^{\infty} \text{Im} \ \frac{1}{(1-it)^{s}} \Big( \coth(\pi t) -1 \Big) \ dt = \frac{1}{2} \int_{0}^{\infty} \text{Im} \ \frac{\coth( \pi t) }{(1-it)^{s}} \ dt - \frac{1}{2} \text{Im} \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{(1-it)^{s}} \ dt
\displaystyle \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{(1-it)^{s}} \ dt = \frac{i}{1-s}\frac{1}{ (1-it)^{s-1}} \Big|^{\infty}_{0} = \frac{i}{s-1}
\int_{0}^{\infty} \text{Im} \ \frac{\coth( \pi t) }{(1-it)^{s}} \ dt = \frac{1}{2} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \ \text{Im} \ \frac{\coth(\pi t)}{(1-it)^{s}} \ dt = \frac{1}{2} \text{Im} \ \text{PV} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{\coth(\pi t)}{(1-it)^{s}} \ dtLet z = 1-it= \frac{1}{2} \text{Im} \ \text{PV}\int^{1+ i \infty}_{1- i \infty} i \coth \Big( \pi i (z-1) \Big) \frac{dz}{z^{s}} \ dz = \frac{1}{2} \text{Im} \ \text{PV}\int^{1+ i \infty}_{1- i \infty} \cot \Big( \pi(z-1) \Big) \frac{dz}{z^{s}} = \frac{1}{2} \text{Im} \ \text{PV}\int^{1+ i \infty}_{1- i \infty} \frac{\cot (\pi z)}{z^{s}} \ dzwhere the contour is a vertical lineSince there is a branch point at the origin, close the contour to the right.Then \int_{0}^{\infty} \text{Im} \ \frac{\coth( \pi t) }{(1-it)^{s}} \ dt = \frac{1}{2} \text{Im} \ \Big( \pi i \text{Res} \Big[ \frac{\cot(\pi z)}{z^{s}} , 1 \Big] + 2 \pi i \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \text{Res} \Big[\frac{\cot (\pi z)}{z^{s}}, n \Big] \Big)

=\frac{1}{2} \text{Im} \ \Big( \pi i \Big( \frac{1}{\pi} \Big) + 2 \pi i \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \frac{1}{\pi n^{s}} \Bigg) = \frac{1}{2} \text{Im} \ \Big( i + 2 i \zeta(s) - 2i \Big) = \zeta(s) - \frac{1}{2}
Putting things together we get\displaystyle \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\sin (s \arctan t)}{(1+t^{2})^{s/2} (e^{2 \pi t} - 1)} \ dt = \frac{1}{2} \Big( \zeta(s) - \frac{1}{2} \Big) - \frac{1}{2} \text{Im} \ \frac{i}{s-1} = \frac{\zeta(s)}{2} - \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{2(1-s)}\displaystyle \implies \zeta(s)= 2 \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\sin (s \arctan t)}{(1+t^{2})^{s/2} (e^{2 \pi t} - 1)} \ dt+ \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{s-1}
 
Last edited:
Random Variable said:
Maybe I'm jumping the gun, but it doesn't look like anyone is going to attempt this one either...

We do recommend that those posting challenges give our members at least a week to respond. This allows those who may only have time to visit us once a week to have a chance to answer our posted challenge questions, all of which we greatly appreciate! (Clapping)
 
I've waited at least a week in the past (or until I was asked to post a solution/evaluation). The last one went unanswered for about 4 weeks.

I actually wanted to see the complete evaluation myself since I had only scribbled some stuff down on scratch paper.
 
Random Variable said:
...I actually wanted to see the complete evaluation myself since I had only scribbled some stuff down on scratch paper.

Haha...I know what you mean there...most times when I post a challenge question, that's all I have in the way of a solution, and it is from these scratchings that I then construct a (hopefully) coherent solution to post. :D

However, I did feel it was incumbent on me to point out our http://mathhelpboards.com/challenge-questions-puzzles-28/guidelines-posting-answering-challenging-problem-puzzle-3875.html, especially since you specifically stated that you may be "jumping the gun." (Wink)
 
We should check that we get what we expect for $s=0$ and $s=-1$.$ \displaystyle \zeta(0) = 0 + \frac{1}{2} - 1 = - \frac{1}{2} $$ \displaystyle \zeta(-1) = -2 \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{t}{e^{2 \pi t} -1} \ dt + \frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{2} = - \frac{1}{2 \pi^{2}} \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{u}{e^{u}-1} \ du = -\frac{1}{2 \pi^{2}} \Gamma (2) \zeta(2)= - \frac{1}{12}$If you want to be really adventurous, you could check that $ \displaystyle \zeta'(0) = - \frac{\ln (2 \pi)}{2} $.
 
Actually it's not that adventurous to find $\zeta' (0)$ from the representation.Differentiating inside of the integral we get

$$ \zeta'(0) = 2 \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\arctan t}{e^{2 \pi t} -1} \ dt - 1 $$Binet's integral formula, from which the asymptotic expansion of the Gamma function can be derived, states that

$$ 2 \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\arctan \left( \frac{x}{z} \right)}{e^{2 \pi x} -1} \ dx = \ln \Gamma(z) - \left( z- \frac{1}{2} \right) \ln z + z - \frac{\ln (2 \pi)}{2} $$ So $ \displaystyle \zeta'(0) = 1 - \frac{\ln(2 \pi)}{2} - 1 = - \frac{\ln (2 \pi)}{2}$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K