Calculating Slit Width from Monochromatic Light Diffraction | 616nm Wavelength

  • Thread starter Thread starter inflames829
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the slit width from monochromatic light diffraction using a wavelength of 616nm. The formula used is λ = y × w / L, where L is the distance to the screen, y is the distance to the second diffraction minimum, and w is the slit width. The user incorrectly applied the formula by using the distance to the second minimum instead of the first, leading to an incorrect calculation of the slit width. The correct approach requires using the distance to the first minimum for accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of diffraction patterns and minima
  • Familiarity with the formula λ = y × w / L
  • Basic knowledge of light wavelength measurements
  • Ability to manipulate equations for solving variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of light diffraction and minima calculations
  • Study the derivation and application of the diffraction formula λ = y × w / L
  • Practice problems involving slit width calculations with varying wavelengths
  • Explore the effects of slit width on diffraction patterns in experimental setups
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering courses, educators teaching optics, and anyone interested in understanding light diffraction and its mathematical applications.

inflames829
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


monochromatic light of wavelength 616nm is incident on a narrow slit. On a screen 1.7m away, the distance between the second diffraction minimum and the central maximum is 1.8cm. What is the width of the slit in mm?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


For the question i use the formula lambda = y x w / L
where L is the length to screen, y is the distance between the middle of the bright spot and the first dark line and w is the slit width. I rearrange the equation to get w and then just pug in the values and I get w = lambda x L / Y and the answer i get is w = 616E-9 x 1.7 / 0.018 = 5.82E-5m, bbut this answer is incorrect, can someone please help me with whatim doing wrong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question gives the distance to the second minimum not the first.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K