Another nontrivial (trick) question in Chapter 7

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rudinreader
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In Problem 13 of Chapter 7 of "baby Rudin," it is established that for a sequence of monotonically increasing functions \( f_n \) bounded between 0 and 1, there exists a function \( f \) such that \( f(x) = \lim_{k \rightarrow \infty} f_{n_k}(x) \) for every \( x \) in \( \mathbb{R} \). However, the claim in part (b) regarding uniform convergence of \( f_{n_k} \) to \( f \) is misleading. A counterexample using step functions \( f_n(x) = I(x+n) \) demonstrates that while \( f \) is continuous, the convergence is not uniform across \( \mathbb{R} \), but it is uniform on compact subsets. The conclusion suggests a correction to part (b) to specify uniform convergence on compact subsets of \( \mathbb{R} \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of monotonically increasing functions
  • Familiarity with pointwise and uniform convergence
  • Knowledge of step functions and their properties
  • Basic concepts of real analysis as presented in "baby Rudin"
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions and differences between pointwise and uniform convergence in real analysis
  • Examine the properties of step functions and their applications in convergence proofs
  • Learn about compact subsets in \( \mathbb{R} \) and their significance in analysis
  • Explore counterexamples in mathematical proofs to understand common pitfalls
USEFUL FOR

Students of real analysis, mathematicians interested in convergence properties, and educators teaching advanced calculus concepts will benefit from this discussion.

rudinreader
Messages
167
Reaction score
0
Problem 13 in Chapter 7 of baby Rudin states:

Assume \{f_n\} is a sequence of monotonically increasing functions on R with 0 \leq f_n(x) \leq 1 for all x and all n.
(a) Prove that there is a function f and a sequence \{n_k\} such that f(x) = \lim_{k \rightarrow \infty}f_{n_k}(x) for every x in R.
(b) If, moreover, f is continuous, prove that f_{n_k} \rightarrow f uniformly on R.

Anyone else notice a problem with (b)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have boldy decided to post what I think is a misleading error in baby Rudin. And it's slightly less trivial than the error in Definition 1.5 (ii). I urge anyone to correct me if I'm wrong.

Nonetheless, I can even strengthen the hypothesis with f_1 \leq f_2 \leq ... and get a counterexample to (b). Set f_n(x) = 0, x \leq -n, f_n(x) = 1, x > -n. I.e. f_n(x) = I(x+n) is a sequence of step functions. In particular, step functions are monotonic increasing, so they satisfy the hypothesis. This is a pointwise convergent sequence, every subsequence converges to the same thing, f(x) = 1. f is continuous, but the convergence is not uniform.

However, it converges uniformly on compact subsets. In summary, I think that's a typo. (b) should read f_{n_k} \rightarrow f uniformly on compact subsets of R.

P.S. You can also construct a sequence of strictly increasing functions that will yield the same counterexample. I think you can modify f_n(x) = tan^{-1}(x+n) appropriately.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K