Answer: Anti-Symmetric Matrix: Necessary 0's Diagonal?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

An anti-symmetric matrix must have a zero diagonal. This is established by the property that for any element on the diagonal, the equation \( A_{ii} = -A_{ii} \) holds true, which only holds when \( A_{ii} = 0 \). In the context of dimensions, a 2x2 anti-symmetric matrix has a dimension of 1, while a 2x2 symmetric matrix has a dimension of 3. This distinction is crucial for understanding the structural differences between symmetric and anti-symmetric matrices.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix properties, specifically anti-symmetric matrices
  • Familiarity with matrix dimensions and their implications
  • Knowledge of matrix transposition and its effects
  • Basic algebraic principles related to equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of anti-symmetric matrices in linear algebra
  • Explore the implications of matrix dimensions in different contexts
  • Learn about the relationship between symmetric and anti-symmetric matrices
  • Study the applications of anti-symmetric matrices in physics and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as researchers and engineers who utilize matrix theory in their work.

Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello

I have a small question. Is it necessary for an anti-symmetric matrix to have a 0's diagonal ?

I have this question about the dimension of 2x2 symmetric matrices vs. dimension of anti-symmetric 2x2 matrices.

The solution is that the dim(symmetric) is 3 while dim(anti-symmetric) is 1, illustrated by a matrix with a zero diagonal.

anti-symmetric is when A=-transpose(A), will only a 0's diagonal satisfy this ?

thanks !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of this in terms of what must be on the main diagonal. You know that for an anti-symmetric matrix, $\mathbf{A}=-\mathbf{A}^{T}$. In an element-by-element fashion, you would write $A_{ij}=-A_{ji}$. But for elements on the main diagonal, $i=j$, and hence you'd have to have $A_{ii}=-A_{ii}$. What numbers do you know of that satisfy $x=-x$?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K