Pranav-Arora said:
What do you mean by "elastically scattered"?
Yes i know that the energy of a photon given off by an excited atom is no higher than the incoming radiation, but is the energy given off always equal to that of incoming radiation?
And yes i know that energy is inversely proportional to wavelength.
Just answering you questions about my response.
Elastically scattered means the incoming photon comes back out without losing any of its energy - naturally it has the same energy , so same wavelength as when it went in.
No the energy of an emitted photon is not
always the same as the incoming, could be less than the incoming photon - but only if the atom was excited to the 2nd or higher level. [I gather, from some computations in this thread, that in this case it actually gets excited to the 3rd energy level - important for you to realize that I did
NOT need to know that in order to answer the question!]
OK so you knew that energy is inversely proportional to wavelength for a photon. In that case you should have been able to answer the question - if you had recognised what the question was asking!
The question asked "what is the shortest wavelength photon emitted?".
The inverse expression between energy and wavelength means that question could be re-written as "what is the largest energy photon emitted?"
Since you knew that any emitted photon would be the same, or lower energy, you should have recognised that you were after the same photon that went in. - Option (a)
Arguably, the question is really testing whether you can convert Angstroms to nanometres!
NOW, had
all the options been longer than the incoming radiation, you would have had to work out which energy level the atom could be excited to [apparently the 3rd level], then calculate the energy and wavelength of the radiations for drops to intermediate levels to make you selection.
As I said before: that would make it a 5-10 minute question rather than a 1 minutes question - so inappropriate for the multiple choice sections of most tests/exams