Anti-Helmholtz coil configuration

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Niles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coil Configuration
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the magnetic field configuration of two coils arranged in an anti-Helmholtz setup. Participants clarify that while the magnetic field along the z-direction is straightforward to calculate, determining the field along the x-direction requires deeper analysis. The relationship derived from Maxwell's Equations indicates that the derivatives of the magnetic field components are interrelated, but this does not yield a direct expression for the x-direction field. Advanced electromagnetic texts, such as those by Jackson, Smythe, and Stratton, provide further insights into the complexities of off-axis magnetic fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's Equations, particularly div B = 0
  • Familiarity with magnetic field configurations and their calculations
  • Knowledge of advanced electromagnetic theory
  • Experience with elliptic integrals and their applications in electromagnetism
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of magnetic fields from current loops using elliptic integrals
  • Explore advanced electromagnetic texts, specifically Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics"
  • Research the mathematical techniques for calculating off-axis magnetic fields
  • Examine the symmetry properties of magnetic fields in coil configurations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students of electromagnetism seeking to deepen their understanding of magnetic field configurations and their mathematical descriptions.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi

Say I have to coils in the anti-Helmholtz configuration as in the attached picture. It is pretty easy to find the field along the z-direction, as this is introduced in introductory EM. However say that I would like to know the field along the x-direction. This I don't know how to find.

What I *do* know is that the Maxwell Equations (div B = 0) tell me that
<br /> \frac{dB}{dx} = \frac{dB}{dy} = -\frac{1}{2}\frac{dB}{dz}<br />
But does this imply that the field along x, B(x), is simply -B(z), the negated B-field along the z-direction?


Niles.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
div B = 0 is equal to \frac{\partial B_x}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial B_y}{\partial y} = - \frac{\partial B_z}{\partial z}
Using symmetry, x and y must be the same, therefore \frac{\partial B_x}{\partial x}= - \frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial B_z}{\partial z}
This does not give you any magnetic field! It is just the derivative of the field at some specific point - probably along the central axis. Looking at the (x,y)-plane right in the middle of the coils, you have a field going radially inwards/outwards (depending on the orientation).
 
Thanks, that was kind of you.
 
The off-axis field from a current loop is written as an expansion in elliptic integrals (or sometimes other functions, depending on the coordinate system you choose). Here is a site that came up in a Google search for off-axis field from a loop:
http://www.netdenizen.com/emagnettest/offaxis/?offaxisloop
but there are many others. The field from a pair of coils is then a sum of the fields from the individual loops.

More extensive derivations/explanations are found in advanced E&M texts like those by Jackson, Smythe, and Stratton.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
557
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K