Antibonding MO do they exist in reality?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sudar_dhoni
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reality
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Antibonding molecular orbitals (MOs) exist as real solutions to the molecular Schrödinger equation, characterized by a node-plane between nuclei, indicating a change of sign in the wave function. These orbitals arise from the linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) through constructive and destructive interference, leading to both bonding and antibonding states. In the ground state, antibonding orbitals are typically unoccupied, while electrons preferentially occupy lower-energy bonding orbitals. The concept of superposition is fundamental in understanding the formation of these molecular orbitals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of molecular orbital theory
  • Familiarity with the Schrödinger equation
  • Knowledge of atomic orbitals and their properties
  • Basic grasp of quantum mechanics principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) method
  • Explore the implications of nodes in molecular orbitals
  • Learn about the superposition principle in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the differences between bonding and antibonding orbitals in various molecular systems
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, quantum mechanics enthusiasts, and professionals in molecular modeling or computational chemistry will benefit from this discussion.

sudar_dhoni
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
do antibonding molecular orbital exist in reality or
is it an empty space in which an electron can move about freely and not involving itself in bonding.
if they exist then how can the 2 atomic orbitals interfere both constructively as well as destructively simultaineously to give both Bonding as well as AntiBonding orbitals?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Within the single-particle approximation, the antibonding orbital is an excited state of the molecule. Furthermore, in the ground state this orbital should be empty.

I'm not sure what you're asking in the second question. When you bring multiple atoms together, the Hamiltonian changes and thus the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian change. One way of describing the new eigenstates is to write them as linear combinations of the atomic orbitals. Basically, you're just using the atomic orbitals as a basis to construct the molecular orbitals (or eigenstates) of the new Hamiltonian.
 
The plus OR minus represents two different possibilities. Bonding and anti-bonding do not occur in the same orbital. Electrons generally take the lower energy orbital, that is the bonding orbital. Antibonding occurs when two orbitals come together out of phase.
 
sudar_dhoni said:
do antibonding molecular orbital exist in reality or
is it an empty space in which an electron can move about freely and not involving itself in bonding.

Antibonding orbitals certainly exist. Orbitals are your solutions to the molecular schrödinger equation. Not all of these solutions correspond to 'bonding' patters, i.e. attraction between nuclei. The ones which are anti-bonding are generally the ones which have a node-plane (plane where the wave-function is zero, i.e. a change of sign) between the nuclei. More generally, such wavefunctions tend to be termed ungerade (German for 'odd'), whereas the 'bonding' orbitals are gerade ('even').

(The fact that they have a node is a clue to why they're usually higher in energy as well)

if they exist then how can the 2 atomic orbitals interfere both constructively as well as destructively simultaineously to give both Bonding as well as AntiBonding orbitals?

Ah! Now you get to the actual MO theory, which is to basically form the MO's by combining atomic orbitals. This is actually just an approximation, but it does qualitatively describe which MOs you end up with.

Anyway, the basic rationale for this is simple superposition. If A and B are your wave functions for individual atoms, then A + B is the wavefunction for the two of them together. (This is true if the electrons of the two atoms don't interact. Since they do interact, this becomes an approximation) But: A - B is a solution as well. That's superposition.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
17K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
881
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
10K