Antiferromagnet more subblatices

  • Thread starter Thread starter matematikuvol
  • Start date Start date
matematikuvol
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
In ordinary definition antiferromagnet lattice has to sublattices, one with spins up, and one with of spin down in ##T=0##. Why in some cases people discuss situations with four or even more subblatices? Do you have explanation for this? Some references maybe?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have specific examples in mind?
 
I'm speaking in general. I just see that in some papers some authors uses for example four sublattices for body centered cubic lattice. Why not two? I don't understand this.
 
I could speculate about spin waves, or non-collinear antiferromagnetism, or with a non-elemental material there may be multiple magnetic sublattices, or some other situation but without something specific I can't say more than that.
 
One example will be enough...
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top