Antimatter and bubble chambers?

  • Thread starter Aidyan
  • Start date
  • #1
150
10

Main Question or Discussion Point

I'm confused now... how can be antiparticles be detected in a bubble chamber which is made of ordinary matter? Why does a positron leave its trace interacting with the chamber gas without annihilating immediately?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
18,756
1,823
I'm confused now... how can be antiparticles be detected in a bubble chamber which is made of ordinary matter? Why does a positron leave its trace interacting with the chamber gas without annihilating immediately?
Antimatter is charged, and charged particles ionize atoms in the bubble chamber, which leads to emission of photons along the track.

Positrons (and other charged particles) slow down by collisions, mainly with electrons, and because the positron has the rest mass of an electron, the slowing down is more rapid than for heavier particles.
 
  • #3
150
10
Hmmm.... I don't feel this answers the question. Why is there any ionization at all and not an immediate annihilation at the first collision? What is observed are several collisons of a positron with many electrons, and yet no annihilation? That doesen't make sense to me.
 
  • #4
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
2019 Award
24,045
6,669
Why should there be immediate annihilation? Or more quantitatively, how "immediate" do you think it should be, and why? (Remember, if it lasts a microsecond, it will travel 1000 feet)
 
  • #5
150
10
Why should there be immediate annihilation? Or more quantitatively, how "immediate" do you think it should be, and why? (Remember, if it lasts a microsecond, it will travel 1000 feet)
In this context "immediate" would mean "at the first collision".
 
  • #6
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
18,756
1,823
Hmmm.... I don't feel this answers the question. Why is there any ionization at all and not an immediate annihilation at the first collision? What is observed are several collisons of a positron with many electrons, and yet no annihilation? That doesen't make sense to me.
The range of coulomb interaction - attraction or repulsion - is much greater than the range for annihilation. There is a lot of 'distance' between electrons and atoms.
 
  • #7
150
10
The range of coulomb interaction - attraction or repulsion - is much greater than the range for annihilation. There is a lot of 'distance' between electrons and atoms.
Ok, this makes more sense... but 'googled' and couldn't find a document explaining how it is quantified. Does someone have an idea from what parameters the range of annihilation depends and/or a typical quantitative value?
 
  • #8
453
15
You are right this does seem difficult to google. I thought about just writing down the cross section for e+e- to two photons, but actually I am not sure that that captures everything since at low energies the e+e- pair usually form the bound state positronium before they annihilate. I also seem to recall there is a thing called the "impact parameter", b, which gives the cross-section a dependence which I think is something like [itex]e^{-b.k}[/itex], so that it goes down as the impact is less "head on" and as the momentum goes up. That doesn't give any hint of the scale that matters though. Also I think it is for two approximately plane wave initial states, which is probably not very reasonable if the target electrons are bound in atoms.

But the overall picture is that the positrons are not very likely to annihilate while they are fast-moving, they need to slow down first by scattering off things.
 

Related Threads on Antimatter and bubble chambers?

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
931
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
759
Replies
3
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
815
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
3K
Top