Any book the elucidates the use of diffirentials?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ronaldor9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenge of understanding the manipulation of differentials in mechanics books, particularly how they are treated as algebraic symbols. The original poster seeks recommendations for books that clarify the use of differentials without excessive rigor, questioning whether a deeper study of differential manifolds is necessary for this understanding. The provided link to a resource by the University of Wisconsin offers additional context on calculus and differentials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus concepts, particularly differentials.
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation of mathematical symbols.
  • Knowledge of differential equations and their applications.
  • Basic exposure to differential geometry, particularly differential manifolds.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research books on "Calculus with Differential Forms" for a comprehensive understanding of differentials.
  • Explore "Introduction to Differential Geometry" for insights into the rigorous treatment of differentials.
  • Study "Calculus on Manifolds" by Michael Spivak for a deeper grasp of differential manipulation.
  • Investigate online resources or courses that focus on the practical applications of differentials in mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying calculus and differential equations, as well as educators seeking to clarify the concept of differentials in a less rigorous context.

ronaldor9
Messages
91
Reaction score
1
The trouble I have in reading mechanic books, at least the ones I have, is that they manipulate diffirentials as though they are algebraic symbols. Now, I know that typically the first year calculus student is told that the differential operator is to be viewed as one symbol and not the quotient of two diffirentials. Are there any books that can elucidate, and justify, the manipulation of diffirentials in such a manner without being too bogged down in rigor; or would I have to wait to study differential manifolds which I presume does place rigor in such manipulations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K