Anyway; I shouldn't have to be bombarded with people saying the way I study makes no sense, its not a good way to do it, I won't understand anything from doing it, they don't see the value in doing it like that for long term retention, I'm doing it the wrong way. I was even trying to be nice enough to explain things as thoroughly as possible, short of me writing a book... I just asked if anyone knew of some books that have the kind of blueprints I have a use for. I shared information I was asked about, hoping that someone would share information back with me, because that seems to be how it works. I don't know. A few people understood that.
If you people are REALLY as curious as you act like, then get a degree in neuroscience, and really dig down deep for the answers you are looking for, to understand the innerworkings of the brain. You are not going to get satisfying answers in a forum chat. There are books, and journal articles, that can be found to study this stuff. Those aren't satisfying enough to me, personally. The program I wrote that calculates the forgetting curve, and calculates the spacing of repetitions, uses calculations from a neuroscience study on forgetting, and one calculation of a formula that I personally applied because it fit the data better. The paper left me with a lot of questions that have answers, but are nowhere to be found yet, and probably not even discovered yet.
I'm just another person that used the internet in search of a resource for me to do something fun. I'm clearly not a famous person that made an "Ask me anything" forum chat, like some famous inventors and authors do on reddit for their fans. I have no fans. I never want to be famous.
I do want to thank the majority of you though, I want to thank you even more than the people who were trying to be helpful. You made me realize how stupid of a decision it would be for me to take a math tutoring job after the pandemic. I do not want to keep explaining concepts every way I can think of, to people who do not actually have an interest in understanding them. I do not understand what motive lies behind the behavior of people doing this, except maybe these people get satisfaction in tricking other people into trying to solve a problem for a situation that does not really exist. The trick is to present a situation, which at first appears to be that information is not understood due to the way that it is available, making it seem as though it is incompatible with the framework of their perceptions. They get people to work on solving the problem of reorganizing the information, and delivering it in all these new packages, down to the point at which it should be clear to a monkey as to what information is being conveyed. Well you tricked me. Jokes on me. I was playing another dumb game that people play, called "Who's more dumb, me or you!" Well I didn't know I was playing, so you win. It's not the first time people played that game with me. Thanks for reminding me how much I do not want to deal with other people. Having to do this as a job would be horrible.