B Any examples of naturally occurring holograms?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Green T
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the existence of naturally occurring holograms, sparked by a trail camera video showing a red dome that may be a lens reflection. Participants explore definitions of holography, noting that butterfly wing colors and oil slicks result from interference, which could be related to holographic principles. Some mention that certain starfish possess structures that function as holographic lenses, although the term "hologram" is debated in its application to natural phenomena. The conversation highlights the complexity of defining holography, distinguishing between mere interference and the specific wavefront reconstruction associated with true holograms. Ultimately, the consensus leans toward the rarity of naturally occurring holograms as traditionally defined.
Mr Green T
Messages
8
Reaction score
5
TL;DR Summary
holograms, light, illusions, nature
Just downloaded a very interesting trail camera video that appears to contain a holographic red dome on the ground. Highest probability it's internal to the lenses and some reflection. It caused me to do a bit of fruitless searching on the topic of naturally occurring holograms. Do naturally occurring holograms exist?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How are you defining a hologram? What in the trail camera pictures reminded you of holography? I'm not aware of too many naturally occurring monochromatic light sources and interfernce within the coherence length...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holography
 
I believe the colour on the wings of butterflies is caused by interference and so may be classed as a hologram.
 
  • Like
Likes Nik_2213, sophiecentaur and Mr Green T
Mr. Green T has it. Butterfly wing colors, as well as those colored rings on oil-covered water and the color of peacock feathers, are all the result of constructive structured interference. This is mathematically identical to a hologram, creating a "false color" in white light, although not generating the displacement optical illusion we usually think of.

IIRC, some starfish have periodic structures that are actually holographic lenses, which would be an example of the more typical holographic usage. These are not the well-known eyespots on the tips of the arms, but scattered along the "skin".
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Nik_2213, Mr Green T and hmmm27
berkeman said:
I'm not aware of too many naturally occurring monochromatic light sources and interfernce within the coherence length.

tech99 said:
I believe the colour on the wings of butterflies is caused by interference and so may be classed as a hologram.
I think it's only a matter of degree but that may be crucial for the definition of 'hologram' to apply. The bands of colour you see in a thin film have very low spatial frequency across the film and only require low coherence of the illumination (only the order of the thickness of the film).

OTOH, holograms that are created optically do not need high coherence of the light that they are viewed by. However, I seem to remember being shown hologram slides in the 60s which were only visible with laser light (in the laser lab at Uni).

Evolution is great though; it often (/always?) produces structures (variation of the hard chitin that insects are built of) in a way that 'designers' never would. It works by positive reinforcement of a design that gives a good result. (Hmm; a bit like some of my attempts at electronics along the lines of a blind watchmaker)
 
sophiecentaur said:
I seem to remember being shown hologram slides in the 60s which were only visible with laser light (in the laser lab at Uni).
Me too. Also, the 'apparently' special requirements for holography seem to have eased (thick concrete benches etc.). Maybe the coherence length of the source lasers is much higher and the chromatic aberration of the optics may be lower. That would affect the contrast range of the holograms.
Some of the staff seemed to have less than perfect understanding about the 'philosophy' behind holography. When we undergrads asked smartarse questions they went a bit wobbly. lol
 
sophiecentaur said:
I seem to remember
sophiecentaur said:
Me too.
I certainly hope so!
 
  • Haha
Likes sophiecentaur and berkeman
Vanadium 50 said:
I certainly hope so!
I seem to remember hoping that, too!
 
  • #10
After the escape of all the "curses upon mankind" from Pandora's box, nothing remained in the box but "Hope".
One of the curses released, was memory loss in the second childhood.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
  • #11
tech99 said:
I believe the colour on the wings of butterflies is caused by interference and so may be classed as a hologram.
That's quite a stretch. Holography (wavefront reconstruction) generates an image of the original object; what do you propose is the original object here?
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
  • #12
Mr Green T said:
TL;DR Summary: holograms, light, illusions, nature

Do naturally occurring holograms exist?
No. A hologram is a recorded interference pattern that, when illuminated correctly, reconstructs a wavefront generated from a (previously illuminated) object. I am not aware of such a naturally occurring phenomenon.
 
  • #13
Joe M said:
IIRC, some starfish have periodic structures that are actually holographic lenses, which would be an example of the more typical holographic usage. These are not the well-known eyespots on the tips of the arms, but scattered along the "skin".
Can you provide a reference for this?
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
  • #14
Andy Resnick said:
generates an image of the original object; what do you propose is the original object here?
But it is possible to generate holograms from a mathematical model. Structures of tens of nm can be made to achieve this but microwave and sound holograms are possible.
A search seems to throw up a lot of "AI generated hologram" hits but there's a lot of marketing nonsense all over that area. Princess Leia still has a lot to answer for, I think.
 
  • #15
Joe M said:
IIRC, some starfish have periodic structures that are actually holographic lenses, which would be an example of the more typical holographic usage.
Starfish do have photophores that can produce light from their skin. I found no details about the complexity of the organ in starfish. In cephalopods and fish, the photophore can flash and flicker, change colour and may have an optical lens.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photophore
 
  • #16
tech99 said:
I believe the colour on the wings of butterflies is caused by interference and so may be classed as a hologram.
I call that diffraction.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
  • #17
Hornbein said:
I call that diffraction.
So would I. The term 'hologram' implies much more than mere interference; if not, then Newton's Rings would also be holograms. And, at longer wavelengths, so would electronically steerable radio antenna arrays. Where would oe stop?
 

Similar threads

Back
Top