The discussion centers on selecting an undergraduate major that effectively prepares students for graduate studies in environmental science, with a focus on geophysics. Participants emphasize the advantages of pursuing a traditional physics degree over a geophysics program, which they find lacks rigor and is more geology-focused. The importance of evaluating the specifics of environmental science programs is highlighted, as many are deemed insufficiently challenging. The conversation suggests that a strong foundation in physics or chemistry, supplemented by relevant electives, is the most beneficial path for aspiring geophysicists.
PREREQUISITESStudents considering a career in geophysics, academic advisors guiding undergraduates in science majors, and professionals in environmental research seeking foundational knowledge in physics and geophysics.
Asphodel said:I think in many cases, the better path is undergrad physics, grad physics with geophysics research or possibly geophysics program at this point. The undergrad "geophysics" programs I've seen are more of geology than geophysics, and not really that rigorous. So you'd probably do better taking a normal physics program for now, and filling in electives of interest.
Environmental science is really damn broad. Specifically, you could probably come at it from just about any rigorous math / science / engineering major and do fine. Actual undergrad environmental science programs probably also have drawbacks due to lack of rigor, so if that's available to you, you should also take a very hard look at the specifics of the program before deciding to actually choose it as your primary major.