The discussion revolves around experiences and advice related to pursuing a career in geophysics, particularly in the context of selecting an undergraduate major that would facilitate graduate studies in environmental science. Participants share their insights on the rigor of various programs and the relevance of different scientific disciplines.
Participants express differing views on the best undergraduate path to prepare for graduate studies in environmental science, with no consensus on whether geophysics or physics is preferable. Concerns about the rigor of environmental science programs are shared, but opinions vary on the implications of this.
Some participants highlight the importance of evaluating specific programs for their rigor and relevance, indicating that personal experiences may vary significantly based on individual circumstances and institutional offerings.
Asphodel said:I think in many cases, the better path is undergrad physics, grad physics with geophysics research or possibly geophysics program at this point. The undergrad "geophysics" programs I've seen are more of geology than geophysics, and not really that rigorous. So you'd probably do better taking a normal physics program for now, and filling in electives of interest.
Environmental science is really damn broad. Specifically, you could probably come at it from just about any rigorous math / science / engineering major and do fine. Actual undergrad environmental science programs probably also have drawbacks due to lack of rigor, so if that's available to you, you should also take a very hard look at the specifics of the program before deciding to actually choose it as your primary major.