Any interesting reactions at 500kV? This might be DIY-able

  • Context: Electrical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter halfelven
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interesting Reactions
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and potential experiments that could be conducted using a Van de Graaf generator operating at 400-500 kV, particularly focusing on DIY projects. Participants explore various aspects of particle acceleration, ion sources, and possible applications of the generated beams.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that a Van de Graaf generator at 400-500 kV could be achievable for an amateur and considers its use for particle acceleration.
  • Another participant points out the complexity of creating negative helium ions, mentioning the need for a duoplasmatron and the challenges associated with it.
  • Concerns are raised about the energy levels being below the Coulomb barrier for nuclear transmutation, suggesting that nuclear reactions may not be feasible at this energy.
  • Participants discuss the possibility of Coulomb excitation (coulex) as a viable experiment, noting its relatively high cross-sections and the need for gamma-ray detection equipment.
  • Mass spectrometry is proposed as another application, with a reference to a relevant study, although it may require significant equipment like magnets.
  • One participant questions the necessity of negative ions, proposing that positive ions might be easier to produce and suggesting the use of heavier ions that can be vaporized.
  • A later reply clarifies the distinction between tandem and non-tandem Van de Graaf designs, noting that tandem designs could yield more energy but require negative ions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of producing negative versus positive ions and the implications for experiments. There is no consensus on the best approach or the potential outcomes of experiments at the discussed energy levels.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions regarding ion sources and the energy levels involved, indicating that the discussion is contingent on these factors. The complexity of constructing certain devices and the specific requirements for experiments are also noted.

halfelven
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I just realized a Van de Graaf generator around 400...500 kV might be easily doable, by an average amateur working in a garage.

I was also thinking these days about a DYI cyclotron project, which I scrapped because the magnet is just too hard to make and feed. But then I figured the Van de Graaf too could be used to accelerate particles, within the limit indicated above.

I'm just not sure if anything interesting happens at that energy level.

Assume the ion source is something simple (hydrogen, helium, etc). Assume a simple two-electrode linear design for the "accelerator". Can anything be done within these constraints?

(A 1 MV VdG generator, while possibly achievable by a dedicated and resourceful amateur, is a much more difficult project that requires very significant effort, so let's ignore anything at that level.)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Helium is not simple. To get a negative ion source to make helium, you need a special device called a duoplasmatron. IIRC the helium atom won't accept an extra electron in its ground state, so there is a trick involving an excited state.

I believe the energies you're talking about are quite a bit below the Coulomb barrier even for protons on protons, so you won't be able to do anything like nuclear transmutation. (Remember that what you get is really the energy in the c.m. frame, not the energy in the lab frame.)

You could probably do Coulomb excitation, a.k.a. "coulex." Coulex is a process in which the beam nucleus interacts electrically with a nucleus in the target, causing it to rotate. It generally has huge cross-sections compared to nuclear reactions, so it's relatively easy to study. The rotating target nucleus then deexcites by emitting gamma rays, so you would need some kind of gamma-ray detector. I'm guessing that a NaI would be the cheapest, although if you have some money, small planar HPGe detectors are really not that expensive these days.

Another possible application is mass spectrometry. Here is an example: http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.0126 I believe this can be done with basically no detectors or electronics, but you might have to build some big magnets.

Another possibility is studying the stopping power of materials and the biological effects of ionizing radiation. E.g., ion beams can be used to treat cancers; you could probably design experiments using plants, insects, etc. that might actually produce some interesting science.
 
Why negative ions? I thought it's easier to make positive ions - maybe a hot filament would suffice? (I'm pretty ignorant in this area, so that's why I'm asking)

And if making positive ions is easier, how about heavier ions of elements easy to vaporize (Hg, iodine, noble gases... the list is big), completely stripped of electrons. Those should gain more kinetic energy from the given potential, provided I could make them somehow.

Coulex does sound interesting. I'll investigate it.
 
Oh, sorry -- I worked with a *tandem* van de graaf in the past, and I just subconsciously assumed that was what you had in mind. From the point of view of a DIY-er, I don't know whether a tandem or non-tandem design makes more sense. A tandem gets you a lot more energy for the same voltage, but it does require negative ions, not positive ones.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
17K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K