I'm looking to build a small particle accelerator for a science fair

In summary, the conversation revolved around the speaker's participation in a science fair and their plan to build an electron accelerator. They considered using radioactive particles, but ultimately decided to use electrons due to safety concerns. The speaker also discussed their concern about legal issues and the possibility of creating antimatter. They shared some potential sources for electrons, including a hot wire or wood, and asked for confirmation on the accuracy of a Yahoo! Answers response and a scientific paper.
  • #1
Oss Spy
4
0
Oddly enough, it's for a science fair :)

Anyway, I joined the Science Club at my high school earlier today and I learned that we'll be entering our a science fair, winners of which will go to regionals. I read Michio Kaku's (forgive any misspellings) book Hyperspace and it somewhat motivated me to build one...and the science fair will be my reason. Note: we're expected to bring in the results, processes, and pictures rather than the project itself.

What source of particles should I use? Something radioactive would be fun...however, I have no desire to have an awkward conversation with the CIA with skeptical nods and "Mhms" between sentences. I'm not entirely sure what I should use. Granted, I haven't done much research

I'm only looking to accelerate to whatever speeds I can reasonably reach. I don't want it to be very big (a football field is a little to much), but at the same time I want some reportable results. If it could fit into a workshop/garage (it's about 20ft from door to end, so a radius of 5ft should allow plenty of room for movement) I would be a very happy person, but I could do with smaller.

I'm also concerned about power usage. I don't intend to do anything on the same scale that Kaku did. The size of his experiment shorted the power in his home and his was around the size of a football field. I expect to not come too close to that, but it is still a concern of mine. If anyone had any instructions on how to build a generator (a Van de Graff generator would suffice) I would be pleased...if anyone knew a price range on pre-built ones I would be elated, but I don't have a problem DIYing the whole thing.

Another thing I'm concerned about are the magnets, but let's not get ahead of ourselves here. I'll need the above information first before I worry about anything else.


Note: I may not be able to do this. I've already emailed the head of my region's science fair about my little project for specific rules pertaining to my experiment. I was unable to find anything on the website (most of which dealt with regulations about living experiments), and I'm waiting with bated breath for my restrictions.


Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'm a little hesitant for someone like yourself to be working with high voltages and vacuum pressures. The high voltage alone can easily kill you with just a single mistake. Do you have ANY experience with electronics before this?
 
  • #3
Drakkith said:
I'm a little hesitant for someone like yourself to be working with high voltages and vacuum pressures. The high voltage alone can easily kill you with just a single mistake. Do you have ANY experience with electronics before this?

This.

Maybe you could start smaller, like a railgun?
 
  • #4
Sorry for the delayed response. I myself do not have much electrical experience, however I know that my dad does (we remodeled a room next to our deck and he rewired it up to code...by himself) and I intend to have him supervise my electric antics. I also know the safety precautions (e.g. DON'T TOUCH IT) and I have a fair bit of common sense when it comes to things that are lethal.
 
  • #6
Oss Spy said:
What source of particles should I use? Something radioactive would be fun...however, I have no desire to have an awkward conversation with the CIA with skeptical nods and "Mhms" between sentences. I'm not entirely sure what I should use. Granted, I haven't done much research

The easiest option would be to just use electrons. They can be created with a hot wire (light bulb filament)
If you want to use radioative materials to create e.g. positive helium ions - also known as alpha particles, you could use polonium 210. A small amount of that stuff can be ordered from amazon. Just search for "static master refill" on amazon.com and you should find it. It's a very strong alpha source (250 microcurie = 9 million decays per second). In fact it's so strong, schools wouldn't get a permit to use it in physics class. It's intended to be used for neutralizing static charges. However if you use that you don't need high voltage since the alpha particles will already have 5MeV when they are produced i.e. they move as fast as if they had been accelerated by 5 million volts.
 
  • #7
I seriously do not recommend using any radioactive materials at all. Not only are they hazardous to yourself, a simple mistake or mishandling could expose others as well. And even if it was such a tiny amount that it effectively poses no hazard, I guarantee you that anyone that hears they were exposed to ANY amount of radiation will flip out and probably cause you serious legal problems.
 
  • #8
If you are afraid of legal issues you could also just use a piece of wood. In 1kg of normal wood there are a few thousand decays per second most of which are due to potassium 40. A few percent of these decays even produce antimatter (positrons).
 
  • #9
just wondering. lightning produces antimatter above the clouds. if it were possible to make antimatter right in the accelerator. antimatter anhilates! but is it possible to make antimatter at home, even theorethically.
 
  • #10
Sorry for my delayed response (again). In any case, thank you Zoidberg for that information :) I'm leaning more towards simply using electrons (smaller mass and easier to obtain) and I was looking through Yahoo! answers and I found an interesting answer. Here's the link:

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080816223721AAoJyyL

Is this accurate? I was tempted to take this and go with it, but I would like a bit of confirmation first. After all, no one likes to build a machine only to realize it doesn't work.

Again, sorry for my delayed response.

EDIT: I also found some information here: http://www.ifpan.edu.pl/firststep/aw-works/fsII/alt/altineller.pdf

Is this credible as well?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Oss Spy said:
Sorry for my delayed response (again). In any case, thank you Zoidberg for that information :) I'm leaning more towards simply using electrons (smaller mass and easier to obtain) and I was looking through Yahoo! answers and I found an interesting answer. Here's the link:

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080816223721AAoJyyL

Is this accurate? I was tempted to take this and go with it, but I would like a bit of confirmation first. After all, no one likes to build a machine only to realize it doesn't work.

Again, sorry for my delayed response.

EDIT: I also found some information here: http://www.ifpan.edu.pl/firststep/aw-works/fsII/alt/altineller.pdf

Is this credible as well?

Those look really complicated.

I have one sitting in my living room you can have. Actually, looking around, I have 4 sitting in my living room! Gads, I am a hoarder.

Everyday examples of particle accelerators are cathode ray tubes found in television sets

I'm pretty sure that if you could explain the theory behind how they work, and brought in an old 12 inch black and white screen TV made in the 70's, that would really impress the teacher, and you'd get an A. With a few demonstrations with magnets, and full color glossy diagrams, of course.

I'm afraid I can't help you with how they work though. How does heating up a filament eject electrons? And how are they accelerated? Are those really electrons that I see when the screen lights up? How would you prove that they are electrons? Does deflecting the (supposed) beam of electrons with magnets near the screen mean anything? How would you measure the deflection of the beam? What speed are the (supposed) electrons traveling at? How could you measure that with just a magnet? What are the internal components in a TV tube that no one really knows about? What happens to the (supposed) electrons after they hit the screen? Do they just sit there? How many are there? How could you count them? Is there even a way to count them? What's the relationship between magnetic flux, electron velocity, and electron deflection?

Ahhhh!

hmmm... The 'famous' guys at Fermilab probably didn't build their own accelerator. They just did the experiments.

ps. Do not attempt to disassemble an old TV tube. They will im/explode, and you will most surely die.
 
  • #12
Oss Spy said:
and I was looking through Yahoo! answers and I found an interesting answer.

First, anyone who thinks you need "appropriate low vacuum greasy stuff" doesn't know what he is talking about. Second, if you can't tell that he doesn't know what he's talking about, that means that you don't have the technical know-how to pull this off.

This is fraught with hazards, and if you don't know what you are doing, you are likely to hurt yourself or others. You need to pick another project.
 
  • #13
DrZoidberg said:
If you are afraid of legal issues you could also just use a piece of wood. In 1kg of normal wood there are a few thousand decays per second most of which are due to potassium 40. A few percent of these decays even produce antimatter (positrons).

Or just buy some salt substitute which is potassium iodide.
 
  • #14
I'd have to say that a CRT is probably the perfect thing for you. You wouldn't even need to disassemble it or anything. Just have it there, maybe take the case off if you wanted to detail the interior. Explain how it all works and stuff and you should be good. I mean how many people realize that a plain old TV works on similar principles that the Large Hadron Collider uses. Accelerated subatomic particles confined and guided by magnetic fields!
 
  • #15
Drakkith said:
I'd have to say that a CRT is probably the perfect thing for you. You wouldn't even need to disassemble it or anything. Just have it there, maybe take the case off if you wanted to detail the interior. Explain how it all works and stuff and you should be good. I mean how many people realize that a plain old TV works on similar principles that the Large Hadron Collider uses. Accelerated subatomic particles confined and guided by magnetic fields!

But if you take the case off, I'd advise covering the entire thing with an old fish tank or something. (If you plan on plugging it in that is.) Someone might want to touch something while saying; "What's this?"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flyback_transformer"
For example, a large color TV CRT may require 20 to 50 kV with a horizontal scan rate of 15.734 kHz for NTSC devices.

20,000 volts, is a lot.

ps. I also have an old fish tank on my front porch that will fit perfectly over one of the 5 particle accelerators I have in my living room.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #16
OmCheeto said:
But if you take the case off, I'd advise covering the entire thing with an old fish tank or something. (If you plan on plugging it in that is.) Someone might want to touch something while saying; "What's this?"

True, that would be a good idea.
 
  • #17
Buy a CRT monitor and... ta-da! Particle accelerator.

EDIT: Dang-it! Someone beat me to it.
 
  • #18
Not very helpful today, are we?

I'm being serious about this. I'm looking to build a linear particle accelerator and I'm looking for some advice. There's a reason I'm looking for help: it's because I don't want to screw this up. I can do this with or without your help; however, I would like help so I can speed up the process. If you aren't going to be helpful tell me now :)
 
  • #19
Please reread the PF Rules on dangerous activities. If you have decided to do something dangerous "with or without our help", you are too immature to do it safely. We cannot help you injure (or worse!) yourself and others.

If someone said "I want to jump out of an airplane holding a bedsheet over my head as a parachute - what color is best?" we wouldn't help them either. It would not be doing them a favor.
 

1. What is a particle accelerator?

A particle accelerator is a machine that uses electromagnetic fields to accelerate and collide charged particles, such as electrons and protons, at high speeds. These collisions allow scientists to study the properties and behavior of these particles, which can lead to new discoveries and advancements in various fields of science.

2. How does a particle accelerator work?

A particle accelerator works by using an electric field to accelerate particles and a magnetic field to steer them in a circular path. The particles are then guided through a series of accelerating structures, known as cavities, which increase the speed of the particles. The particles eventually reach near-light speeds and then collide with a target or another beam of particles.

3. What materials are needed to build a particle accelerator?

Building a particle accelerator requires a complex and specialized set of materials, including magnets, vacuum chambers, radio frequency cavities, and high-voltage power supplies. Additionally, a control system and computer software are needed to operate and monitor the accelerator.

4. Is it possible to build a small particle accelerator for a science fair?

Yes, it is possible to build a small particle accelerator for a science fair. However, it would require a significant amount of resources, expertise, and safety considerations. It is recommended to consult with a mentor or professional scientist before attempting to build a particle accelerator.

5. What are some potential safety concerns with building a particle accelerator?

Particle accelerators can be dangerous if not built and operated properly. Some potential safety concerns include radiation exposure, electric shock, and high-pressure hazards. It is important to follow all safety protocols and guidelines when building and operating a particle accelerator, and to consult with a professional for assistance if needed.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • DIY Projects
Replies
2
Views
336
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Mechanics
2
Replies
40
Views
9K
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
18K
  • Mechanics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Mechanics
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top